Consider Hiring Former Prosecutors for Nonlitigation In-House Jobs
What about hiring former prosecutors for nonlitigation roles, where sharp legal minds are needed for complex transactions? Can prosecutors adapt their litigation skills to help a company drive revenue? Absolutely.
December 20, 2018 at 11:10 AM
6 minute read
You're a corporate general counsel and you must hire an in-house litigator. You'll likely hire former prosecutors, as many companies do.
What about hiring former prosecutors for nonlitigation roles, where sharp legal minds are needed for complex transactions? Can prosecutors adapt their litigation skills to help a company drive revenue? Absolutely.
Prosecutors are self-driven, quick studies. They're decisive, trained to exercise good judgement, and to communicate well with nonlawyers. They are experienced negotiators, and will promote an ethical culture. These qualities bring value to a company. Not all former prosecutors are equally talented, but the best will bring these skills to the job. Even if a former prosecutor needs extra time to learn the ins and outs of the business, the payoff is worth the investment.
Self driven, quick studies. Prosecutors earn their stripes through self-driven, on-the-job training. From day one, prosecutors have voluminous caseloads, and must quickly understand the facts, law and strategy. The mind of a prosecutor churns through inputs and information fast.
While a prosecutor processes voluminous information, they also must juggle the myriad interests in a courthouse, not unlike corporate headquarters. They must build and maintain relationships with victims, witnesses, experts, law enforcement, the community and the judge. They must manage deadlines on indictments, pretrial motions and hearings, discovery and trial. Most prosecutor offices have formal training programs but because of limited budgets, prosecutors largely learn by doing, which takes drive, confidence, independence and intelligence.
Corporate recruiters and GCs: take heed of these skills when staffing your teams. According to Russell Reynolds Associates in their 2015 piece, “Inside the Mind of the General Counsel,” working swiftly and independently is a core competency of in-house jobs for lawyers who face immediate, multi-disciplinary, and global responsibilities, including advising the business on legal issues and risk, overseeing corporate governance programs, and managing other attorneys (in-house and outside counsel).
As one former assistant U.S. attorney and now in-house counsel said, corporations need attorneys with a “founder's mentality,” meaning a company's lawyers must adopt a commercial footing, have an entrepreneurial spirit, bring to life “the art of the possible,” and be driven to find legally permissible avenues to get the deal done.
Decisiveness and good judgment. Prosecutors are trained to make decisions in fast-paced, high-stakes environments and own the outcomes that can affect the victims, the community, law enforcement, the defendant and others impacted.
Similarly, in-house lawyers must remain calm and decisive. The stakes vary between a courtroom and a company: in one, the rest of a person's life, potentially, free or behind bars; in the other, high-stake financials. Executives look to their lawyer for the best—and fastest—legal advice.
Yet decisiveness is not enough. Corporate lawyers' decisions must be grounded in sound judgment. By the time prosecutors get to headquarters, they've been tested: in the courtroom, in front of a judge, jury and often-hostile opponent. In these tension-filled settings, their short and long-term decisions are measured in real time.
Mark Twain said, “Good judgment comes from experience and experience comes from bad judgment.” A prosecutors' experience in the courtroom refines their ability to make considered decisions and reach sensible conclusions. The specific actions may be different—how to cross-examine a witness versus how to negotiate a contract—but the importance of exercising sound judgment in both situations is the same. For in-house counsel, according to Spencer Stuart's 2012 research, “So You Want to Be a General Counsel? How to Maximize Your Chances,” “good and trusted judgment” is often praised as the “most important attribute.”
Communication and negotiation skills. Prosecutors are trained to explain complex legal concepts to nonlawyers. They must be “explainer-in-chief” to make abstract legal concepts understandable to a broad audience by explaining complicated facts in a cogent fashion.
How do they do it? By converting abstractions into simple terms, speaking in plain English and using stories, hypotheticals, and examples that cite everyday experiences. For in-house counsel, this is a particularly relevant skill, because executives, who prioritize deal making, must grasp legal guidance quickly. Companies must comply with a range of cross-border laws, understand how old laws apply to new technologies, and balance business opportunity with legal risk. Clearly articulating these concepts in a board room, as a prosecutor would, adds a lot of value to a company.
Prosecutors also routinely negotiate plea deals, balancing the interests of defendants, victims and the government. They will put those skills to good use as negotiators in a business setting. Of course, negotiating a contract in an office is different than reaching a plea agreement in a holding cell. But prosecutors innately get negotiation dynamics.
Culture carriers. Prosecutors vary, but their on-the-job training allows them to command authority. They work in high-stakes environments where much rides on their results. Such visibility and accountability demands outsized professionalism and ethical conduct in their public and personal lives—values they will uphold in their post-prosecutorial careers.
There's an old saying about prosecutors: They're “sometimes wrong, but never in doubt.” For a company, they'll get an action-oriented, take-charge lawyer. Executives welcome that initiative-seizing because their lawyer helps grow the bottom line. Prosecutors also uphold their training to act with the highest ethical standards. While that may compel the former prosecutor to counsel caution on a deal, executives should be comforted knowing their new colleague is protecting their interests.
While they may not have years of experience in corporate-related matters, former prosecutors bring to nonlitigation roles relevant and transferable skills that will bring value to a business from an often-overlooked talent pool worthy of a company's investment—and they should be highly considered for these positions.
Adam L. Rosman is First Data's executive vice president & general counsel, and was an assistant U.S. attorney in Washington, D.C.
Emily R. Zerkel is counsel at First Data Corp., working primarily on the company's real estate and procurement matters. She was a prosecutor in Black Hawk County, Iowa.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250