Is the FTC to Blame for Facebook Scandals?
In a recent speech in Dublin, Electronic Privacy Information Center president and executive director Marc Rotenberg argued that Facebook scandals around fake news and privacy were a result of lax enforcement by the Federal Trade Commission.
December 20, 2018 at 01:44 PM
3 minute read
With high-profile criticism mounting on multiple fronts on issues such as fake news and election interference, Facebook has had a rough few years. But one of the country's foremost data privacy advocates doesn't place the blame for such controversies squarely on the social media giant. Rather, he argued that the Federal Trade Commission has played a significant role in events such as the Cambridge Analytica scandal, Brexit and election of President Donald Trump.
“It's easy to criticize Facebook for their business practices and their disregard for the rights of internet users,” said Electronic Privacy Information Center president and executive director Marc Rotenberg in a speech in Dublin. “However, the real responsibility lies with those who have the authority to regulate internet companies and protect basic rights. We must expect more of those who are responsible for safeguarding the public interest.”
Rotenberg was speaking at an event organized by the Irish legal rights organization FLAC. His comments were reported by Irish Tech News and The Irish Times.
Rotenberg said the FTC has failed to enforce the terms of a consent order that EPIC and other consumer data privacy advocate groups obtained against Facebook in 2011. Specifically, the agency has not found “a single infraction” of the consent order in the seven years since it was approved, he said, adding that, for that reason, he actually has had “a certain amount of sympathy” for the company.
The consent agreement was entered into by Facebook to settle FTC allegations that the tech company deceived consumers by telling them they could keep their information on the platform private but then repeatedly allowing it to be made public. (Coincidentally, The New York Times reported this week that, according to Facebook documents the newspaper obtained, the social networking company gave Microsoft, Amazon.com and other large tech companies, far greater access to users' data than it has disclosed.)
“This year we have repeatedly urged the U.S. Federal Trade Commission to take action against Facebook,” but the agency has failed to do so, “so we have asked the U.S. Congress to monitor the developments of the Federal Trade Commission,” Rotenberg was reported as saying.
In his speech, Rotenberg highlighted other issues that EPIC currently is working on, including a Freedom of Information Act request for Trump's tax records—an undertaking Rotenberg said he is “optimistic” about, predicting that the information would be released “in the next year, perhaps.”
Earlier this week, however, a federal appellate court rejected the request, ruling that the president's tax returns, like those of any other citizen, are protected by the IRS.
In his address, Rotenberg also encouraged Ireland to fulfill its potential as a critical “influencer” of global social media companies' actions, particularly in the areas of privacy and hate speech, noting that the republic's “role as a key regulator of the Internet giants is being watched worldwide.”
“As home to the European headquarters of the world's biggest social media corporations, Ireland now has a critical responsibility to safeguard fundamental rights in the digital age,” he said. “Enforcement under the GDPR and new laws to address the challenges of fake news and hate crimes in cyberspace should be top priorities for the Irish Government.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readHubSpot Chief Legal Officer Departs 'Upon Mutual Agreement' After Just 2 Years
2 minute readLawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
Trending Stories
- 1Increased Costs Proved a Drag on Profits for PA's AmLaw 200 in 2024
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-81
- 3Mental Health Issues Don’t Get a Holiday
- 4'It's Got to Be a Wake-Up Call:' Atlanta Attorney Hopes $16M Verdict Spurs Training Changes at Hotels
- 5FTC Bans 'Junk Fees' in Live-Event Tickets and Short-Term Lodging
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250