Number of Whistleblower Complaints in UK Significantly Higher Since GDPR
According to data that British law firm Reynolds Porter Chamberlain received from the U.K.'s ICO, the number of whistleblower complaints filed in the three-month period from June to August 2018 more than doubled compared to the past year.
December 21, 2018 at 01:59 PM
3 minute read
The number of reported whistleblower complaints about potential data breaches at businesses has increased 165 percent since the General Data Protection Regulation went into effect in May 2018, according to data from the United Kingdom's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO).
U.K.-based law firm Reynolds Porter Chamberlain reported in a blog post that there were 82 whistleblower complaints filed in the three-month period of June to August 2018, up from the 31 reported during a previous three-month period—February to April 2018.
A law firm spokesperson confirmed in an email to Corporate Counsel that the figures, which he said are not generally available, came directly from the ICO in the United Kingdom, which did not provide additional information about the nature of the whistleblowers.
The ICO is the independent regulatory office charged with enforcing data privacy rights, including those protected under the GDPR. The European Union's expansive regulation imposes new rules on any entity that offers goods and services to people in the European Union or that collects, processes or stores data tied to EU citizens.
According to Reynolds Porter Chamberlain, the ICO is actively soliciting whistleblowers to come forward with any information, increasing the risk that noncompliant activity at businesses will be investigated and potentially fined. In addition, the blog post said that because of the media exposure surrounding the GDPR, employees are now more aware of their responsibilities and willing to come forward with data protection concerns.
“Data breaches are now regularly headline news stories and that means more whistleblowers coming forward,” partner Richard Breavington said in the post. “In recent years, data protection has become a major concern not just of government and regulators, but also the general public. It is not just disgruntled employees who act as whistleblowers, but genuinely concerned individuals.”
Last month, it was revealed that a Portuguese hospital was seemingly the first business to be hit with a monetary penalty under the GDPR, after it was fined 400,00 euros—about $453,000—by the country's data protection supervisory authority for allowing too many users to have access to patient data in the hospital's patient management system.
The hospital, Central Hospital of Barreiro Montijo, is appealing the decision, and may initiate legal proceedings, it said at the time.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute readWill Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
$25M Grubhub Settlement Sheds Light on How Other Gig Economy Firms Can Avoid Regulatory Trouble
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 2As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 3General Warrants and ESI
- 4GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
- 5Authenticating Electronic Signatures
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250