HHS Issues Voluntary Cybersecurity Guidance for Health Care Orgs
Dubbed “Health Insurance Cybersecurity Practices: Managing Threats and Protecting Patients,” the four-volume publication is the culmination of a two-year effort by 150 government and private health care and cybersecurity experts.
January 03, 2019 at 12:54 PM
3 minute read
In 2016, $6.2 billion was lost by U.S. health care systems because of data breaches, according to a new report by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. But the department is aiming to reduce that figure by providing voluntary cybersecurity practices to health care organizations of all sizes.
Dubbed “Health Insurance Cybersecurity Practices: Managing Threats and Protecting Patients,” the four-volume publication is the culmination of a two-year effort by 150 government and private health care and cybersecurity experts. The task force's work was legislatively mandated by a 2015 federal law that charges the group with analyzing and making recommendations regarding securing and protecting the health care sector against cybersecurity incidents.
“Given the increasingly sophisticated and widespread nature of cyberattacks, the health care industry must make cybersecurity a priority and make the investments needed to protect its patients,” the report stated.
The two volumes of the report discuss the 10 cybersecurity practices and subpractices for small health care organizations and medium-sized and large health care businesses, respectively. Both are intended for IT and/or IT security professionals.
“It is tempting for those who own a health care practice or are part of a small-to-medium–sized health care organization to think that cyberattacks only affect large hospitals and health care organizations,” the report said. “However, attackers [who targeted the health care industry] focused on smaller targets, resulting in a lower number of leaked records in that industry.”
A third portion of the report provides resources and templates, while its 36-page, anecdote- and statistic-laden main document discusses the current cybersecurity threats facing the health care industry and issues a call to action for the health care industry, especially executive decision makers, with the goal of raising general awareness of the issue.
“Like combatting a deadly virus, cybersecurity requires mobilization and coordination of resources across myriad public and private stakeholders, including hospitals, IT vendors, medical device manufacturers, and governments (state, local, tribal, territorial, and federal) to mitigate the risks and minimize the impacts of a cyberattack,” it said.
The document, its authors added, “does not create new frameworks, re-write specifications, or 'reinvent the wheel.'”
Rather, it attempts to “move the cybersecurity needle” by starting to “educate health sector professionals on an important and generally accepted language of cybersecurity and answering the prevailing question, 'Where do I start and how do I adopt certain cybersecurity practices?'”
Part of that process, the main document said, is understanding five of the most current and common cybersecurity threats to health care organizations, which the report identified as: e-mail phishing attack; ransomware attack; loss or theft of equipment or data; insider, accidental or intentional data loss; and attacks against connected medical devices that may affect patient safety.
“These threats can affect organizations in various parts of a hospital and in different health care settings,” according to the report. “Cyberattacks can happen anywhere, any time.”
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHealth Care Giants Sue FTC, Allege Lina Khan Using Loaded Process to Vilify Pharmacy Benefit Managers
3 minute readHigh-Flying Genetics Testing Firm GeneDx Hires Ex-Zoetis GC as Legal Chief
2 minute readAs AI Transforms Drug Development, FDA Is Scrambling to Figure Out Guardrails
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250