Five Ways Retailers Can Prevent Customer Discrimination Claims
For retail companies, knowing how to identify bad customer service, as opposed to prejudiced conduct, is the key to preventing discrimination claims, this employment lawyer says.
January 04, 2019 at 02:39 PM
3 minute read
Almost everyone has gone to a store and dealt with bad customer service. No matter where a shopper goes, they run into the chance of having a bad experience with an employee. But for retail companies, knowing how to identify bad customer service, as opposed to prejudiced conduct, is the key to preventing client discrimination claims. Edward Harold, a regional partner in New Orleans at labor and employment firm Fisher & Phillips, spoke to Corporate Counsel on how to best prevent those discrimination claims against your company.
- Uniform training is the first step. Harold said that in-house attorneys should make sure that all store employees are trained in the same way. “Discrimination comes around a lot of specific activities, especially during theft prevention,” he explained. “It is very easy to create an appearance that you are suspicious of someone because of race, even if really you're just suspicious because it's a teenager.” Howard said there is no law protecting teens from age discrimination. Training is key to customer service and you want to make sure your employees are creating the same experience for everyone.
- Make sure the policies are the same for everyone, every time. Referencing last year's Starbucks incident in Philadelphia, Howard said that what he didn't know whether the store manager had implemented that same policy of requiring a purchase to use the bathroom against other people of all races. (He did not represent anyone in the matter.) He explained that you need to make sure you can show that for every situation, the employee follows the same policy. “If you do X, Y and Z every time and you can show that you do X,Y and Z every time, you shouldn't have a problem.”
- Have a diverse workplace. Having diverse staff helps break prejudices that employees may already have, Harold said “Older people working with younger people is my favorite example,” Harold said.
- Do not argue with customers. If an employee does receive a complaint, it is best to address it head on and find a solution to the problem and continue further training.
- Pay attention to customer reviews. The best way to know if the policies you have in place are working is to read the customer reviews and what is said on the customer complaint line. “They need to understand the difference between someone complaining about customer service and someone who has felt discriminated against,” Harold said. “You need to be able to focus on those issues and people ready to address them.”
Read More:
Subtle Harassment, Code Words and Implicit Bias: Proving Everyday Discrimination in Court
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Puts Beat Down on Ex-Wrestling CEO Vince McMahon for Not Reporting Settlements
3 minute readDOJ Files Antitrust Suit to Block Amex GBT's Acquisition of Competitor
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250