How Do You Make Digital Oversight Work in the Boardroom?
If there's one thing corporate boards have heard a lot about over the last few years, it's been cybersecurity. In my engagements as a director and work on governance issues, a day doesn't go by without another briefing that tries to tell board members something new about digital and cyber dangers.
January 07, 2019 at 11:50 AM
5 minute read
If there's one thing corporate boards have heard a lot about over the last few years, it's been cybersecurity. In my engagements as a director and work on governance issues, a day doesn't go by without another briefing that tries to tell board members something new about digital and cyber dangers.
We've already been told the hacking horror stories, statistics and anecdotes and those are important to understand in order to manage risk. There is one even more crucial aspect of board responsibility for digital that does demand more support and guidance from boards. That is, what role should the board take in digital oversight and what contributions should be expected from the board?
It is not the Board's role to directly create a company's digital/cyber policy, but rather to ask the right questions and set the tone from the top.
Questions to ask:
- How does our strategy take into account the next digital revolution of IoT, AI, Cloud Computing and Big Data?
- Are we leveraging our data assets to build our business?
- What kind of data do we hold? And where is it housed?
- Who has access and what is the authentication process?
- Have we segregated and treated with higher security our key intellectual property?
- What are the firewall/encryption/protocol systems in place and are these actively monitored?
- How do we review past attacks and responses? Do we have a cyber breach response plan in place? Has it been tested?
- Who is directly responsible? The chief information security officer (CISO) and what is their reporting line?
The ability to ask the right questions requires digital expertise on the board. As not everyone on the board will be digitally savvy, it's important to touch on this subject at each meeting in order to build that knowledge. Each board should have at least one digital director, if not two. Good digital oversight can also mean that the board reaches outside for information and validation. The board needs to budget time for outside advisers on digital trends and guidance on looking around the corner at how digital will impact their business models and channels.
Digital expertise is one of the boardroom's newest demand areas, but one with vague qualifications. While chief financial officers are go-to talent for filling a board's need for finance expertise, Chief technology officers or CISOs are still uncommon in the boardroom for adding tech skill. Despite the “C” in their titles, these execs still aren't at the corporate level of a CFO. They are perceived by some search firms and board members to lack the seniority or seasoning in broader governance oversight to be effective in a board setting, and their tech skills, while solid, may be seen as narrow or limited. A CTO on your board could well be an expert on cybersecurity, data privacy laws or trending mobile retail opportunities, but prove weak on other urgent governance issues.
How digital oversight is filled and led at the board level is also crucial (and often overlooked). Modern corporate boards, especially at public companies, face a huge, demanding workload. A common tactic is to assign digital governance to the audit committee. But audit has increasingly become the board's dumping ground for risky, technical matters. Unless you upgrade the committee's skills and capabilities in tech, your digital governance could grow worse instead of better. Another alternative is to consider chartering a new board committee for tech and innovation. Whichever route you take, assure you have a committee chair who has savvy in the specific tech issues facing your company, and who is able to lead well, and can work a well-planned agenda.
Finally, remember that your board can't properly oversee digital matters in isolation. First, it needs a solid relationship between your company's tech staff (CTO, CISO, etc.) and the board, particularly the committee chair in charge. Staff ability to effectively explain technical matters to board members requires tact and emotional intelligence. Skill in building and maintaining these relationships should be reviewed as part of tech staff's professional organizational development and be part of their evaluation and pay setting.
This staff/board interface includes the reporting in the board deck that the board sees on technology matters. Start with careful discussion on the indices the board needs to see, what matters they cover and how they are reported. Each slide should have a brief bulleted conclusion at the bottom. Dashboard reporting is useful here, but first devote careful thought to what is to be reported. Be sure you have a summary that explains the insights and the recommended actions.
The need for a tech/innovation perspective can be folded into the annual governance committee review on potential board refreshment needs. Your board's evaluation and turnover policies may assure board continuity … but are they bringing in the fresh skills in tech and other fields the company will need tomorrow? And are you “siloing” board tech oversight, but missing its application to other areas, like shaping future corporate strategy?
On the board, strong board leadership, continued education on the impact of digital on the business, a clear assignment of digital oversight responsibility within the board's structure; good relations with tech staff; and well-defined, insightful board reporting on digital info will keep your board informed and ahead of the trends.
This seems like a big digital shopping list for the board, but once your boardroom course is set, it becomes surprisingly simple. If every business today is a digital business, that means every role your board plays must now become part of its digital governance.
Betsy Atkins, a founder of Bajacorp, is a three-time CEO currently serving on the boards of Wynn Resorts, SL Green, Schneider Electric and Volvo Cars.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Trending Stories
- 1Linklaters Hires Four Partners From Patterson Belknap
- 2Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 3Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
- 4Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 5Friday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250