Sexual Harassment Cases Surged Last Year in Wake of #MeToo: Seyfarth Report
From the use of press releases to the infusion of sexual harassment-related issues into other strategic priorities, "the #MeToo movement ... has truly permeated pretty much every aspect of the EEOC litigation agenda in 2018,” a co-author of the report said.
January 07, 2019 at 04:47 PM
3 minute read
The ripple effects of #MeToo continue to spread. The movement that highlighted workplace power dynamics and ended the careers of numerous men across various industries also spawned a drastic increase in sex-based discrimination filings at the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission last fiscal year, according to a recent report by Seyfarth Shaw.
The annual report, “EEOC-Initiated Litigation,” stated that the agency filed 41 cases alleging sexual harassment, 11 of which were brought in the last three days of the fiscal year alone. And it recovered nearly $70 million through litigation and administrative enforcement of sexual harassment issues in fiscal 2018, up from $47.5 million in 2017, according to an EEOC press release that the report cited.
“Woven throughout [this year's publication] is the #MeToo movement and how it has truly permeated pretty much every aspect of the EEOC litigation agenda in 2018,” said Christopher DeGroff, a Seyfarth Shaw partner in the Chicago office and co-author of the report.
“The EEOC operates on a strategy enforcement plan where it sets the strategic priorities, and ordinarily those are fairly distinct buckets,” he added. “But this year we saw a general vectoring of all of those, or many of those, to address the #MeToo movement and harassment generally.”
For example, DeGroff said, a couple of EEOC strategic priorities apart from workplace harassment include the protection of vulnerable workers such as migrant workers or younger women, particularly in the hospitality industry, and retaliation.
“While in the past the EEOC has had a distinct view on these, [last year] it doubled down on sexual harassment against these vulnerable workers,” he said. “Much of this year's EEOC retaliation [claims] were based on retaliation for reporting harassment.”
The EEOC also maintained its focus on sexual harassment through the use of press releases like the one citing its recovery figures, DeGroff said. In fiscal year 2018, the agency released 65 press releases related to sexual harassment cases, according to the Seyfarth Shaw report.
“The EEOC is using its press releases as a way of getting its cautionary tale out to employers,” said DeGroff, adding that this publicity extends even to the initial filing of a lawsuit. “That is particularly troublesome for employers because often you have a press release that is quoting the allegations before they've been through any stage of scrutiny.”
Moving forward into the new year, DeGroff said he expects the EEOC to continue its aggressive litigation of the #MeToo-related sexual harassment claims that it pursued in 2018 and the year before.
The agency is “looking for a way of using the public attention around the movement as a propellant for its litigation agenda that, frankly, goes back before #MeToo,” he said.
It may be somewhat hamstrung in doing so, however, DeGroff added, because not only is the EEOC currently shuttered as a result of the partial government shutdown, but only two of its five commissioners are seated due to a political holdup in confirming President Donald Trump's picks for the spots.
“Coming back, the EEOC, especially in 2019, is going to be looking for a way to continue to do business consistent with its agenda but during a time when there is significant political swirl around administrative agencies generally,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Unheard of Superpower': How Women's Soft Skills Can Drive Success in Negotiations
Tales From the Trenches: What Outside Counsel Do That GCs Find Inexcusable
Venus Williams Tells WIPL Crowd: 'Living Your Dreams Should Be Easy'
The 2024 WIPL Awards: Law Firm Mentor and Mentee Collaboration
Trending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250