Sexual Harassment Cases Surged Last Year in Wake of #MeToo: Seyfarth Report
From the use of press releases to the infusion of sexual harassment-related issues into other strategic priorities, "the #MeToo movement ... has truly permeated pretty much every aspect of the EEOC litigation agenda in 2018,” a co-author of the report said.
January 07, 2019 at 04:47 PM
3 minute read
The ripple effects of #MeToo continue to spread. The movement that highlighted workplace power dynamics and ended the careers of numerous men across various industries also spawned a drastic increase in sex-based discrimination filings at the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission last fiscal year, according to a recent report by Seyfarth Shaw.
The annual report, “EEOC-Initiated Litigation,” stated that the agency filed 41 cases alleging sexual harassment, 11 of which were brought in the last three days of the fiscal year alone. And it recovered nearly $70 million through litigation and administrative enforcement of sexual harassment issues in fiscal 2018, up from $47.5 million in 2017, according to an EEOC press release that the report cited.
“Woven throughout [this year's publication] is the #MeToo movement and how it has truly permeated pretty much every aspect of the EEOC litigation agenda in 2018,” said Christopher DeGroff, a Seyfarth Shaw partner in the Chicago office and co-author of the report.
“The EEOC operates on a strategy enforcement plan where it sets the strategic priorities, and ordinarily those are fairly distinct buckets,” he added. “But this year we saw a general vectoring of all of those, or many of those, to address the #MeToo movement and harassment generally.”
For example, DeGroff said, a couple of EEOC strategic priorities apart from workplace harassment include the protection of vulnerable workers such as migrant workers or younger women, particularly in the hospitality industry, and retaliation.
“While in the past the EEOC has had a distinct view on these, [last year] it doubled down on sexual harassment against these vulnerable workers,” he said. “Much of this year's EEOC retaliation [claims] were based on retaliation for reporting harassment.”
The EEOC also maintained its focus on sexual harassment through the use of press releases like the one citing its recovery figures, DeGroff said. In fiscal year 2018, the agency released 65 press releases related to sexual harassment cases, according to the Seyfarth Shaw report.
“The EEOC is using its press releases as a way of getting its cautionary tale out to employers,” said DeGroff, adding that this publicity extends even to the initial filing of a lawsuit. “That is particularly troublesome for employers because often you have a press release that is quoting the allegations before they've been through any stage of scrutiny.”
Moving forward into the new year, DeGroff said he expects the EEOC to continue its aggressive litigation of the #MeToo-related sexual harassment claims that it pursued in 2018 and the year before.
The agency is “looking for a way of using the public attention around the movement as a propellant for its litigation agenda that, frankly, goes back before #MeToo,” he said.
It may be somewhat hamstrung in doing so, however, DeGroff added, because not only is the EEOC currently shuttered as a result of the partial government shutdown, but only two of its five commissioners are seated due to a political holdup in confirming President Donald Trump's picks for the spots.
“Coming back, the EEOC, especially in 2019, is going to be looking for a way to continue to do business consistent with its agenda but during a time when there is significant political swirl around administrative agencies generally,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Unheard of Superpower': How Women's Soft Skills Can Drive Success in Negotiations
Tales From the Trenches: What Outside Counsel Do That GCs Find Inexcusable
Venus Williams Tells WIPL Crowd: 'Living Your Dreams Should Be Easy'
The 2024 WIPL Awards: Law Firm Mentor and Mentee Collaboration
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250