Nearly Half of Legal Departments Lack a Strategic Plan, Survey Finds
Many legal departments don't have a formal ops strategy, according to new survey results from Xakia.
January 10, 2019 at 04:56 PM
3 minute read
Legal departments may be flying blind without a legal plan, according to survey results released Wednesday.
The ”Legal Operations Health Check,” conducted by Australian legal matter management software company Xakia, found nearly half of respondents' legal departments didn't have a formal strategic plan.
“Articulating a strategy is a way of keeping yourself accountable and by writing it down you can also share it, and if everybody is on the same page, both metaphorically and physically, that gives everybody the same goal to head towards,” Jodie Baker, Xakia's founder and chief executive officer, said.
Smaller teams were less likely to have a plan in place. One-third of teams with more than 50 members had no plan, compared with 48 percent of teams with 10 members or fewer. Nearly 40 percent of teams with 11 to 50 members had a plan.
Baker said that's likely because smaller companies have fewer resources. If a small team's stretched for time, developing a strategic plan may not be prioritized. But Baker said that the increasing amount of templates available to smaller legal departments can make it easier for resource-thin teams to plan ahead.
“It's gotten much easier for smaller teams to be able to pick up [templates] and articulate their strategy in a way they couldn't before,” Baker said. “But without that, and before those things were available … it's certainly been very difficult for them to do that.”
Larger companies were about three times more likely to report they faced planning-related challenges, which Baker said could be because they have staff designated to reflect on strategy and identify what needs improvement.
Of companies with a legal operations strategy, most said it aligned well with their company's overall strategy. Only 19 percent of respondents said their strategy aligned well with corporate and support functions.
Xakia's survey also found legal teams lacked metrics. Almost half of respondents said their legal ops strategy didn't include well-defined and measurable metrics, and more than half said they don't regularly track metrics. More than 40 percent don't review their legal ops strategy's progress.
“A strategy in and of itself, just writing something down on a template, is great,” Baker said. “But it's only going to get you so far. You need to move toward implementation and part of that implementation is reflecting on whether or not it's effective.”
Baker said the survey had “hundreds” of respondents, mostly from Australia and the U.S., though others responded from Europe, Asia and Africa. Most were general counsel, though 18 percent came from designated legal operations staff. More than 10 percent listed themselves as C-suite executives.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250