The Rearview Mirror and the Road Ahead on #MeToo: Action Items for Corporate Boards
Looking back on the year of #MeToo and forward to the road ahead, corporate boards need to think about and implement constructive change.
January 10, 2019 at 10:40 AM
5 minute read
Looking back on the year of #MeToo and forward to the road ahead, corporate boards need to think about and implement constructive change. Over the last year, high profile scandals consumed headlines, dragged down senior leaders and share values, and challenged preconceptions of corporate culture. It was a year of reckoning for some, a year of heightened awareness for others, and a learning experience for us all.
Like it or not, the scandals of 2018 proved that #MeToo has implications beyond sexual harassment. Scandals from Uber to CBS to Google highlight that organizational culture is a company asset to be protected and nurtured. They confirmed that toxic work environments and inadequate corporate governance can lead to costly financial, legal and reputational risks that threaten sustainability. #MeToo scandals cast a broad spotlight on the positive or negative impact an organization's culture can have on its reputation, value and long-term sustainability. And they proved, in today's era of technology, social media, and employee and consumer activism, the enormous toll workplace misconduct and abuse of power can take on an organization.
For boards who failed to take action, the takeaway was clear—do so at your peril because when the headlines come, directors will be confronted with the inevitable question—“where was the Board?” While no one can predict where fiduciary legal liability ultimately will lie, boards are viewed as the ultimate guardians of an organization's financial, human and reputational capital, and addressing culture issues falls within the Board's responsibilities. Stakeholders expect governance to closely align with issues that drive sustainability and shareholder value. Culture matters.
Boards need to stay ahead of the curve in the year ahead. They should proactively apply the same strategic, risk-based, data-driven and innovative thinking to workplace misconduct issues as they do to business. Six key action items for boards:
- Prioritize culture as a strategic asset. Organizational culture aligns behaviors to promote shared purpose, value creation and innovation. Culture allows companies to adapt and take calculated risks for profitability and long-term growth. Boards should take concrete steps to understand and influence culture “at the top,” the “mood in the middle” and the “buzz at the bottom.” Challenge management. Use scorecards and metrics to measure and monitor culture. Management guru Peter Drucker stated: “culture eats strategy for breakfast.” If culture is poor, even great strategies fail. At its best, culture can create opportunity; at its worst, it destroys value.
- Exemplify the “Tone at the top.” “Walk the talk.” Boards cannot afford complacency or permit unaddressed misconduct or unchecked power. Healthy cultures start with clear, consistent organizationalwide standards, policies, procedures and messaging. Boards should insist on sophisticated investigation processes, visible reporting and strong remedial action. Codes of conduct and forced arbitration clauses should be updated and heightened attention paid to hot lines, whistle blowers and escalation procedures. Companywide training should be mandated and accountabilities assigned.
- Develop talent as a competitive differentiator. Foster diversity and inclusion. Statistically significant numbers show that companies with ethnic and cultural diversity in the top quartile are 33 percent more likely to outperform peers. In an increasingly automated, data-driven, technologically disrupted and high skill-based environment, talent is a strategic differentiator for innovation and risk taking. There is a war for talent. To be competitive, boards will recognize that respectful, safe, diverse and fair work environments attract and retain talent.
- Set compensation expectations. Employment contracts matter. The agenda should include setting compensation, performance and behavioral expectations with management. Executive contracts should be more explicit about what counts as a “cause” for termination with clarity on the types of misconduct exemptions from severance arrangements. Payout terms of higher risk departures will be evaluated for reputational risks. Organizationwide equitable standards should apply.
- Focus on board composition. A board's quality, tenure, skills and diversity are under increasing scrutiny. Investors and other stakeholders are becoming less tolerant of boards that are not reflective of the customer, employee or supplier base.
- Expect more scrutiny. Recognize rising power of institutional investors. Public proxy fights by financial-centric activists are hitting the headlines, but boards must also deal with investors who are longer-term and ESG oriented. The result is a careful balancing act of interests, necessitating more meaningful engagement and disclosure around strategy, risks, compensation, performance and board composition. Boards should expect that culture is on the agenda in the upcoming proxy seasons.
#MeToo has been a catalyst for change across business and society. It has forced a spotlight on culture as a critical corporate asset. Forward-thinking boards should seize the moment to enhance corporate governance practices and reimagine a workplace that has a safe, inclusive, fair and healthy culture aimed at long-term value creation. And we will all be stronger for it.
Amy Conway-Hatcher, a partner at Baker Botts, focuses her practice on corporate internal investigations, corporate compliance matters and defending corporate and individual clients in criminal and civil enforcement matters before the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission and other federal and state enforcement authorities.
Sheila Hooda is an independent board director and strategic advisor.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Trending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250