Divorce Attorneys: In-House Counsel Should Stay Out of Executive's Divorce
Though Jeff Bezos said in a Jan. 8 tweet that he and wife are ending their marriage, it is unclear how their divorce will impact Amazon's day-to-day operations.
January 18, 2019 at 06:00 PM
3 minute read
The founder and CEO of Amazon.com Inc., Jeff Bezos, announced earlier this month on Twitter that he and his wife of 25 years plan on ending their marriage. Divorce attorneys say his in-house team will most likely not be involved in the divorce unless absolutely necessary.
Though Bezos said in the Jan. 8 tweet that he and his soon-to-be-former wife will remain friends, it is unclear how their divorce will impact Amazon's day-to-day operations.
“Ideally, with a company the size of Amazon, it is running irrespective of what is happening in their personal lives,” divorce attorney Brian L. Webb said.
Webb, the founder of Webb Family Law in Dallas, said that when he takes an executive as a client in a divorce filing he takes stock of how he would be able to use the in-house attorneys as a resource.
“Typically what you're going to do is explore to what extent you can use them as a resource and be very aware of what their conflict situation might be so that you don't inadvertently put them in an uncomfortable position,” Webb said. “They are an incredibly valuable resource.”
He said the in-house team tends to have a great knowledge of what the values and assets of the company are. But it is not a good idea to have a member of the in-house counsel team as an active member of an executive's divorce counsel team. Webb explained the executive will need someone who knows how the process works and someone who will tell them what they need to hear.
“We who do this for a living snicker about nondivorce lawyers who want to jump in,” Webb said. “It's just a different kind of an animal.”
Ultimately, it is important for the in-house team to keep doing what it usually does, Webb said. He explained that one of the more important things in-house counsel can do is to not shred documents that they would not normally shred.
Michael Stutman, a divorce attorney at Stutman, Stutman & Lichtenstein in Manhattan, said that it is important for in-house counsel to remember that they represent the company and not the personal affairs of the executive. As an outside divorce attorney, he said there may be times when trade secrets or customer lists become involved.
“However, the line between those two roles may not be as bright as everyone wishes it might be,” Stutman said. “Oftentimes, I believe an executive may not be aware that certain communications between that person and corporate counsel would not be privileged.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute readNLRB Blisters Skilled Care Home Chain That Terminated Nursing Assistant Who Complained About Wages
6 minute readPreparing for 2025: Anticipated Policy Changes Affecting U.S. Businesses Under the Trump Administration
Trending Stories
- 1Exploring the Opportunities and Risks for Generative AI and Corporate Databases: An Introduction
- 2Farella Elevates First Female Firmwide Managing Partners
- 3Family Court 2024 Roundup: Part I
- 4In-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
- 5A Simple 'Trial Lawyer' Goes to the Supreme Court
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250