National Association of Manufacturers Hires Special Counsel to Handle Growing Climate Change Lawsuits
As climate change lawsuits grow more prevalent, Linda Kelly, senior vice president and general counsel of the National Association of Manufacturers, has hired Phil Goldberg, managing partner of the Washington, D.C., office of Shook, Hardy & Bacon, as special counsel to handle the issue.
January 23, 2019 at 05:10 PM
4 minute read
As climate change lawsuits grow more prevalent, Linda Kelly, senior vice president and general counsel of the National Association of Manufacturers, has hired Phil Goldberg, managing partner of the Washington, D.C., office of Shook, Hardy & Bacon, as special counsel to handle the issue.
The association said Goldberg will serve as a senior outside legal adviser and spokesman for the Manufacturers' Accountability Project, a 2017 initiative that opposes climate change lawsuits by states, municipalities and others against businesses such as utilities and gas and oil companies.
Kelly heads the in-house legal arm, the Manufacturers' Center for Legal Action, which is leading the accountability project.
The association said the project was created to “expose the concerted, coordinated political campaign being waged in the courts against America's manufacturers … through a series of baseless public nuisance suits and other legal tactics.”
In a statement Kelly said, “Last year, three public nuisance cases brought by the cities of San Francisco, Oakland and New York were all thrown out by federal judges, and the Manufacturers' Accountability Project will work tirelessly to build on that record in 2019.”
She added that Goldberg “is one of the brightest legal minds in this space and brings impeccable credentials to the table.”
Goldberg co-chairs his law firm's public policy group. He also authored amici briefs on climate change cases submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of Rhode Island. The Rhode Island and New Jersey Supreme Courts cited Goldberg's articles in denying overly expansive public nuisance theories.
Goldberg said in a statement, “The NAM and its Manufacturers' Accountability Project are the tip of the spear in the fight against the wave of unfounded public nuisance lawsuits targeting America's manufacturers. The stakes could not be higher for manufacturers as well as the integrity of our legal system.”
The project grew considerably in 2018 as lawsuits targeting energy producers were filed by 14 municipalities, one state and a group of Pacific coast fishermen. Also, state attorneys general in New York and Massachusetts continue to pursue investigations and litigation against these manufacturers.
The project's website states, “As these suits drag on into 2019, key decisions over the next year could dictate the fate of this litigation.”
For example, San Francisco; Oakland, California; and New York City are appealing the rulings against them. The California cases are in the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and the New York case is in the Second Circuit. NAM said briefings are underway and oral arguments will be heard “in the coming months.”
A threshold question for many of the remaining suits is whether they should be heard in state or federal court, the association said.
Judges in lawsuits filed by the city of Baltimore and municipalities in Colorado and Rhode Island are set to decide the venue issue soon. The association is pushing for federal court.
So far the plaintiffs have not won a case. But their lawsuits may have received a morale boost with the recent bankruptcy filing by the California utility Pacific Gas and Electric Co.
PG&E, whose general counsel, John Simon, recently took on the additional role of interim CEO, faces some $30 billion in potential damages for its alleged role in last year's California wildfires. The fires killed more than 80 people and destroyed over 10,000 homes.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Unheard of Superpower': How Women's Soft Skills Can Drive Success in Negotiations
Tales From the Trenches: What Outside Counsel Do That GCs Find Inexcusable
Venus Williams Tells WIPL Crowd: 'Living Your Dreams Should Be Easy'
The 2024 WIPL Awards: Law Firm Mentor and Mentee Collaboration
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250