Ohio Joins 18 Other States Limiting Franchiser Liability as Joint Employer
Joint employer shield laws are designed to protect corporate franchisers like McDonald's and Marriott International from being jointly responsible for violations of employee rights.
January 23, 2019 at 03:13 PM
2 minute read
Ohio has amended state employment law to limit when a franchiser is considered a joint employer, effective March 20.
Ohio joins at least 18 other states that have enacted joint employer shield laws designed to protect corporate franchisers like McDonald's and Marriott International from being jointly responsible for violations of employee rights, according to the Economic Policy Institute.
The Ohio law seeks to partially limit a 2015 ruling by the National Labor Relations Board in Browning-Ferris Industries.
Supporters of the state legislation included the Ohio Chamber of Commerce, the Ohio Hotel & Lodging Association and the Ohio Restaurant Association. Keith Lake, vice president of government affairs for the Ohio Chamber of Commerce, said Wednesday that the change was important for general counsel and their companies because the Browning-Ferris ruling had blurred the franchisee-franchiser legal relationship.
“It provides more clarity and certainty for both the employer and the franchiser,” Lake explained.
Under the new law, a franchiser will not be deemed a joint employer unless the franchiser agrees in writing to assume the role or a court determines that the franchiser exerted an uncustomary degree of control over the franchisee or its employees.
The law applies specifically to unpaid wages, workers' compensation claims and unemployment compensation claims under Ohio statutes. It does not apply to worker discrimination claims, minimum wage or overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act or claims under other federal laws.
A coalition of trade associations and other industry groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, filed a petition last year with the NLRB asking the agency to redefine joint employment. The agency tried to do so, but was impeded by an alleged conflict of interest of one commissioner.
Jon Hyman, a partner at Meyers, Roman, Friedberg & Lewis in Cleveland and author of The Ohio Employer Law Blog, said the new state law is an “important gesture” carrying real importance on certain state claims.
But Hyman's blog added that until “federal agencies and the federal courts fall in line … franchisors (and other potential joint employers) will continue to operate in a sea of uncertainty on this critical issue.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All11 Red State AGs Demand Damages in Antitrust Lawsuit Shaming ESG Climate Investors
3 minute readRegulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'This Is a Watershed Moment': Daniel's Law Overcomes Major Hurdle
- 2Navigating the Storm: Effective Crisis Management (Part 1)
- 3The Testamentary Exception Does Not Permit a Decedent to Impliedly Waive a Survivor’s Attorney-Client Privilege
- 4Trump 2.0 and Your Career
- 5Matt's Corner: Contributory Negligence Can Be a Bar to Legal Malpractice Recovery
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250