Women GCs Face Sexism, Stereotypes From Firm Lawyers—And It Impacts Who They Hire
Screaming opposing counsel, disrespectful outside counsel and more than one letter addressed to “Dear Sir” are situations women general counsel said they've faced in-house from firm lawyers. Outside counsel's sexism can play a role in who GCs choose not to hire.
January 23, 2019 at 11:51 AM
7 minute read
Many women general counsel face subtle and blatant sexism from firm lawyers, a frustrating, demoralizing and often isolating experience, according to interviews with several female in-house leaders.
The sexism is having repercussions. Many female GCs have dropped sexist outside counsel or stopped hiring them. Lack of diversity at a firm, especially in leadership roles, is seen as a red flag.
Elaine Divelbliss, the general counsel for mobile advertising company Kargo, told Corporate Counsel she sent a letter to a law firm in December about a business matter and received a “paternalistic, condescending” response. In the firm's letter, she said outside counsel tried to convince her she “misapprehended the situation” and wanted to “explain the right way to think about it.”
Frustrated by the letter's assumption of her lack of understanding, despite her 20-year legal career, Divelbliss shared her experience on the Women's General Counsel Network, a Listserv of female in-house lawyers.
“And I was overwhelmed at the response. I think we all were,” she said. “The negative interactions and experiences that female attorneys in-house have had … some of them were just appalling.”
Opposing Counsel
Divelbliss' email struck a chord with Brooke Smarsh, the general counsel of Flow Commerce, who said she faced similar treatment during a phone call with opposing counsel that included both sides' businesspeople.
Smarsh recounted that opposing counsel refused to compromise on any of her sides' listed demands and screamed on the phone. When Smarsh countered with a calm demeanor, bringing up her own company's needs, she said the opposing counsel continued to yell and dominate the conversation.
Even the opposing counsel's client was shocked, she said. At one point, the opposing counsel's phone line abruptly went silent. When the phone was unmuted, Smarsh said the other lawyer apologized, presumably prompted by his client.
“The businessperson on their side at the same time emailed my businessperson and said, 'Oh my god, I've never heard my lawyer speak to someone that way,'” Smarsh said.
In the moment, she said she strategizes ways to work around the issue and still meet her company's needs. After such encounters are over, she's asked other attorneys about their experiences with that particular opposing counsel. She found it's not uncommon that the negative responses are drawn along gender lines.
Attempting to negotiate with someone who doesn't respect women can be demoralizing, Smarsh said, though she's always found ways to accomplish what she needed despite the setback.
“At times, it has gotten so frustrating I've [thought], 'Why did I become an attorney? There has to be an easier way to make a living,'” she said. “Because it really makes you question yourself.”
Another female GC said she once dealt with opposing counsel whose junior partner dominated the conversation and ignored women on her team or treated them with contempt. She asked to remain anonymous for fear of repercussions at work.
“We had multiple women on our team and he would respond addressing the men on our team, even though the men on the team were more junior than the women,” she said. “He would redirect our questions and not answer them when we asked them. But when one of the male colleagues asked the same question in a different way, he would answer it.”
Finally, she called him out—in front of his client. She said she thinks his client agreed with her because the attorney “never spoke another word in the next three months.” Senior partners led his side of negotiations from that point on.
Stereotypes, Dismissals From Hired Counsel
It's not just opposing lawyers that can cross the line into chauvinist and inappropriate behavior. Sometimes, the sexism came from GCs' own outside counsel.
Sarah Feingold, the GC of New York-based e-commerce company Vroom, said she's repeatedly gotten emails and letters from firms soliciting business addressed to “Dear Sirs” or “gentlemen.” She said she tries to give firms the benefit of the doubt—it might be an old template—but “it does sour things from the beginning.”
“Language choices impact inclusivity and impact equality,” Feingold said. “Although people might say, 'Hey, come on, you know gentlemen includes you also,' it doesn't. I'm not a gentleman.”
Castlight Health GC Jennifer Chaloemtiarana said her outside counsel once bypassed her to communicate with her company's chief financial officer instead. She said she's also experienced outside counsel dismissing her concerns or ignoring her requests, instead offering up solutions that don't meet the business' needs.
Some cases of sexism female GCs have experienced were clear-cut. But much of the time, women said it's hard to tell whether they were being disrespected by law firm lawyers because of their gender or because of their position as in-house counsel.
Divelbliss said the two identities may be intertwined, as the GC role becomes increasingly occupied by women.
“The vast majority … of partners at big law firms are men. And more and more general counsel and in-house counsel are women. So I think de facto it's a gender-based issue,” she said.
Women who go in-house, even to top general counsel roles, may face stigmas from firm lawyers that their male counterparts don't. That's something Chaloemtiarana said she experienced during her transition in-house.
She said firm lawyers told her “women go in-house specifically to take on a lighter workload because they can't handle the pressures and family balance of law firm life.” They also made comments about how in-house life must “be so much easier on your family.”
“When a man goes in-house, they're credited with really wanting to get closer to the business. You know, he's got a business head on, and that's why he wants to be inside a company, so he can work on strategy,” Chaloemtiarana said. “And that is entirely why I went in-house.”
A Dealbreaker
Many interviewed GCs said they have dropped or would drop sexist outside counsel. They also try not to hire them to begin with.
Almost every woman interviewed said firms that don't bring in diverse teams are a red flag. Firms with women in leadership roles and a commitment to bringing in diverse talent are more likely to get their business, several interviewed GCs said.
Feingold said she also asks firms how they treat women and other groups underrepresented in the legal field. Networks such as the women's general counsel Listserv are a forum for in-house counsel to share experiences with outside counsel—both good and bad.
Sonia Galindo, the general counsel of Rosetta Stone, said the Listserv's response to Divelbliss' email inspired her to address sexism from outside counsel more often. She and other lawyers said they've always found ways to work with or around sexist outside counsel to get the result their client wants.
“It's not an atypical experience unfortunately. But the email chain was an atypical response to addressing it, which I absolutely applaud and will adopt going forward,” Galindo said. “First and foremost you work the problem. But I think after the dust settles, to address the behavior is part of driving a change.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Unheard of Superpower': How Women's Soft Skills Can Drive Success in Negotiations
Tales From the Trenches: What Outside Counsel Do That GCs Find Inexcusable
Venus Williams Tells WIPL Crowd: 'Living Your Dreams Should Be Easy'
The 2024 WIPL Awards: Law Firm Mentor and Mentee Collaboration
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250