Converging Risks Defy Traditional Corporate Compliance Silos
Global companies face increasingly complex compliance challenges as risks related to imports, exports, economic sanctions, money laundering and cybersecurity evolve and converge.
January 31, 2019 at 02:01 PM
4 minute read
In this new year, global businesses already are contending with considerable turbulence impacted by rapidly evolving U.S. national security threats and related cross-border compliance risks. The result has been much-loathed uncertainty for global businesses, which has been exacerbated by the longest-ever, modern-era U.S. government shutdown. More integrated, holistic compliance strategies, thinking across historical compliance silos, will help address these risks.
The following provides insights from Washington, D.C., on three overlapping spheres of risk that global companies' compliance and risk mitigation strategies likely should address, taking a “cross-fit,” rather than traditionalist approach.
U.S. – China relations
- The so-called U.S.-China “trade war” that erupted forcefully last year is creating significant uncertainty for U.S. businesses' import and export activities. Affected companies that understand and adapt as events unfold will be the least negatively impacted.
- In a best-case scenario, a few areas of business will experience some relief, while many others while face significantly increased challenges. U.S. import tariffs and other punitive measures will ease somewhat, while risks related to exports and investments involving the U.S. and China are increasing for the foreseeable future.
- Arrests in multiple countries of Chinese executives and a U.S. criminal probe of monolith Huawei Technologies related to espionage and U.S. export violation charges will have significant spillover effects into all areas of the bilateral relationship.
- Even U.S. actions that intend to ease some of the pain will create compliance complications. U.S. businesses reliant on imports struggle to keep up with constant changes. (https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/2018-28277.pdf)
Foreign investment and new technology export regulatory requirements
- Investments inbound into the U.S. involving non-U.S. entities, and exports outbound from the U.S., both will confront a new and evolving regulatory landscape. This year will be key for to how new “pilot program” requirements, launched last November by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS) and due to be finalized by February 2020, will be implemented and enforced.
- Following enactment of the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act (FIRRMA) into law, CFIUS mandatory notices, including for non-controlling “foreign” investors, will significantly expand the number of investments impacted by national security restrictions. (https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm506)
- Further expanded CFIUS and export control requirements are anticipated this year, as the U.S. Department of Commerce defines “emerging technologies” that will be subject to higher scrutiny by the U.S. government. (https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2018-12-14/pdf/2018-27148.pdf)
Convergence of cybersecurity, economic sanctions and anti-money laundering risk and regulations
- The irony of the recent U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) public admission that it had been victimized over two years ago by cyberattacks and data theft sums up the rapidly converging regulatory and compliance risks of the modern technological age (https://www.sec.gov/news/public-statement/statement-clayton-011519). The SEC has been increasing its enforcement against companies for failures related to cybersecurity breaches.
- At the end of last year, the SamSam cyberattackers network, whose ransomware attacks the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Criminal Division head termed “an extreme form of 21st-century digital blackmail,” were targeted by DOJ and the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) for money laundering and Iran sanctions violations. For the first time, companies' compliance programs will have to contend with “digital currency addresses” included on OFAC sanctions lists.
- Meanwhile, multinational companies headquartered outside the U.S. are grappling with divided EU and U.S. sanctions strategies targeting Iran, the outcome of which in turn will be affected by Iran's response to international demands to address known money laundering problems in the country. (http://www.fatf-gafi.org/countries/d-i/iran/documents/public-statement-october-2018.html)
Global companies face increasingly complex compliance challenges as risks related to imports, exports, economic sanctions, money laundering and cybersecurity evolve and converge. Getting ahead of the compliance curve this year necessitates understanding the interrelated nature of U.S. government actions and enforcement to address these challenges that will impact important legal requirements.
Jo Ritcey-Donohue is the founder of JRD Law PLLC in Washington, D.C. The firm represents the largest and most sophisticated sovereign and multinational corporate clients in matters relating to complex cross-border risk, corporate governance and compliance legal counseling.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Trending Stories
- 1California Court Denies Apple's Motion to Strike Allegations in Gender Bias Class Action
- 2US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
- 3Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 4African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
- 5Gen AI and Associate Legal Writing: Davis Wright Tremaine's New Training Model
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250