Lex Mundi White Paper Series Offers Crash Course in Blockchain
A 10-paper series from law firm networking group Lex Mundi aims to introduce in-house counsel to blockchain by answering frequently asked questions.
February 06, 2019 at 04:49 PM
3 minute read
Lex Mundi's firm lawyer network has seen a surge in in-house blockchain interest.
That's why the group published a blockchain white paper series Tuesday, according to Jenny Karlsson, Lex Mundi's senior business development manager. The 10-paper series provides an introduction for in-house counsel interested in blockchain implementation or cryptocurrency use in industries such as health care, life sciences, supply chains and finance.
“In-house counsel often contact our member firms because they have questions from their management about the legal challenges and implications of harnessing [blockchain] for the benefit of that commercial business unit and operations. So we came up with the idea of putting together, through our member firms in the U.S., these 10 articles,” Karlsson told Corporate Counsel. “They're really designed to … introduce in-house counsel and interested stakeholders on the implications of blockchain technology on their particular practice areas or industries.”
The series includes papers with advice for blockchain and cryptocurrency companies.
One paper authored by Jenner & Block partner Jason Bradford offers tips on minimizing litigation risk. Bradford wrote that companies in the industry aren't exempt from existing law, and should check whether they need to register with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and obtain state money transmitter licenses. They also shouldn't taunt regulators.
Companies in any industry can struggle with the decision to accept cryptocurrency payments. Two papers in the series address the volatility and tax concerns raised by cryptocurrency. Cheryl Aaron, senior counsel at Michael Best & Friedrich, noted in her paper that cryptocurrency payments are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and that their value may fluctuate more than fiat currencies.
Akerman partner Brian Harris wrote that tax rules around cryptocurrency can also complicate things. The IRS has stated it will treat cryptocurrency as property rather than currency—for now—but still hasn't issued guidance on Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts reports, or FBARs.
“With the uncertainty in whether reporting is required and the potentially high penalties for willful failure to report, the best practice is to report foreign cryptocurrency accounts on FBARs and Forms 8938,” Harris wrote.
Other papers in the series serve as an introduction to blockchain implementation in individual industries. Karlsson said Lex Mundi plans to publish similar blockchain projects in the future with “the benefit of in-house counsel in mind.”
Read More:
Panel: Blockchain for More Than Just Crypto, but Presents New Legal Issues
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Trending Stories
- 1Whether to Choose State or Federal Court in a Case Involving a Franchise?
- 2Am Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
- 3K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 4'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
- 5Which Georgia Courts Are Closed Today?—Here's a List
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250