Report: GDPR-Compliant Companies Experience Shorter Sales Delays
Robert Waitman, director of data privacy at Cisco, said there are a variety of reasons why companies in compliance with the GDPR are seeing this trend.
February 06, 2019 at 06:43 PM
3 minute read
Companies complying with the requirements enforced by the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation are experiencing shorter delays in their sales cycle as it relates to customer data and are, on average, experiencing fewer data breaches, according to a recent report published by Cisco.
Robert Waitman, director of data privacy at Cisco, said there are a variety of reasons why companies in compliance with the GDPR are seeing this trend.
“What we've heard from companies that have their data house in order because of GDPR and other previous regulations is that they have taken steps to reduce the number of sensitive assets they have,” Waitman said.
The 2019 Data Privacy Benchmark Survey published by Cisco indicates that a majority of respondents from across the globe, 59 percent, are in full compliance or mostly in compliance with the GDPR. Twenty-nine percent of respondents said they will be ready within the year and 9 percent of respondents said it would take them more than a year to be ready to comply with the GDPR. Three percent of respondents said they do not believe they need to comply with the GDPR.
“Overall, 97 percent of companies feel they need to comply,” Waitman explained. “The fact that the GDPR has such a global reach was striking.”
The report further showed that customer concerns over data privacy issues have put a hold on sales. Eighty-seven percent of companies have indicated that they have had delays in selling to customers because of data privacy concerns. Although the amount of time of those delays has gone down from last year, the delays found in 2018 were, on average, 7.8 weeks while companies experienced sales delays of 3.9 weeks. The average delay for a “GDPR-ready” company is only 3.4 weeks while those not in compliance yet with the GDPR is 5.4 weeks, according to the report.
“Firms are more open and transparent earlier in the sales cycle and they're getting better at answering those GDPR questions from customers,” Waitman said.
The reality is that most companies will experience some kind of data breach. A majority of the companies reported having a data breach in the past year. However, a lower percentage of GDPR-ready companies, only 74 percent, were impacted by data breaches. This is compared to 89 percent of the companies that are least ready for GDPR. Only 37 percent of GDPR-ready companies experienced data breaches that cost over $500,000 in the last year, compared to 64 percent of the least GDPR-ready companies.
The double-blind survey was sent to companies of all sizes across all industries with 3,200 companies from 18 countries responding.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeta Hires Litigation Strategy Chief, Tapping King & Spalding Partner Who Was Senior DOJ Official in First Trump Term
The Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
Tesla, Musk Appeal Chancery Compensation Case to Delaware Supreme Court
2 minute readEx-Marathon General Counsel Takes Legal Reins of Another Energy Company
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250