BIC Sparks Federal Investigation Into Alleged Counterfeit Lighters From China
The U.S. International Trade Commission voted earlier this month to grant BIC's request for a probe into allegations that foreign and domestic companies are importing Chinese pocket lighters into America that are dangerous and copy BIC's iconic lighter design.
February 14, 2019 at 04:30 PM
4 minute read
The U.S. International Trade Commission is investigating at least a half dozen domestic and foreign companies accused of making or distributing counterfeit pocket lighters that are exported from China into America.
Bic Corp., a French company with a North American headquarters in Shelton, Connecticut, sparked the probe when it filed a complaint with the USITC in December, according to an announcement earlier this month from the federal agency.
The USITC voted to grant BIC's request for an investigation without making any decision on the merits of the case, which will be assigned to a USITC administrative law judge. The judge will hold an evidence hearing and make an initial determination as to whether there are trademark violations under §337 of the Tariff Act of 1930.
BIC, which is seeking to keep the alleged imitation lighters out of the U.S., has asked that the USITC issue a general exclusion order or a limited order and cease and desist orders after it completes the investigation. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe represents BIC.
The USITC action comes after BIC filed a pair of trademark infringement complaints against the alleged Chinese counterfeiters and their stateside distributors before the USITC in Washington, D.C., and the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York in Brooklyn in December.
BIC's factory in Connecticut produces about 1 million lighters a day, while one of the companies named in the probe, Arrow Lighter Inc. and its affiliates, has stated on its website that it has the capacity to make 700 million lighters a year. Arrow Lighter describes itself as one of the world's largest manufacturers and distributors of lighters. The company says on its LinkedIn page that it has been importing lighters from factories in China for two decades.
An attempt to speak with a representative for Arrow Lighter was unsuccessful and the company does not appear to have an attorney of record. Arrow does business as MK Lighter Inc. and MK Lighter Co. of City of Industry, California, according to the USITC.
BIC general counsel and vice president Steve Burkhart could not be reached for comment. But he said in an earlier interview that he's “seen the proliferation of one thing after another of counterfeit products entering the American marketplace.”
Burkhart asserted that BIC took legal action not only as part of an effort to keep the lighters in question out of the country but also to draw attention to the issue of intellectual property theft. He added the lighters in question are dangerous and had failed a series of standard safety tests.
The USITC also is investigating Benxi Fenghe Lighter Co. Ltd. of China; Excel Wholesale Distributors Inc. of College Point, New York; Milan Import Export Co. of San Diego, California; Wellpine Company Ltd. of Hong Kong; and Zhuoye Lighter Manufacturing Co. Ltd. of China.
BIC accuses the defendants of trademark infringement, trademark dilution, unfair competition, deceptive practices, false advertising and committing unlawful acts, including unlicensed importation.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDigging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
5 minute readElaine Darr Brings Transformation and Value to DHL's Business
PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
Trending Stories
- 1Mediators for the Southern District of New York Honored at Eighth Annual James Duane Awards
- 2The Lawyers Picked by Trump for Key Roles in His Second Term
- 3Pa. High Court to Weigh Parent Company's Liability for Dissolved Subsidiary's Conduct
- 4Depo-Provera MDL Could Be Headed to California
- 5Judge Holds New York City in Contempt Over Conditions at City Jails
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250