Bribery Charges Dismissed Against Ex-Telia General Counsel in Sweden
Ex-general counsel Olli Tuohimaa, along with the former CEO and the former deputy chief, were accused in 2017 of paying bribes to obtain telecom business in Uzbekistan.
February 19, 2019 at 05:20 PM
3 minute read
A Stockholm court has dropped criminal bribery charges filed against three executives of Swedish telecom Telia Co., including its former general counsel for Eurasia.
Ex-general counsel Olli Tuohimaa, along with the former CEO and the former deputy chief, were accused in 2017 of paying bribes to obtain telecom business in Uzbekistan. The charges were dropped Feb. 15. All three had denied the charges, and could not be reached for comment on the ruling.
The charges came after the Stockholm-based company agreed to pay nearly $1 billion in penalties to the U.S. and the Netherlands in what prosecutors called “one of the largest criminal corporate bribery and corruption resolutions ever.” The company signed a three-year deferred prosecution agreement for violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and it cooperated in the investigation of the individuals.
As part of remedial efforts, the company replaced its executives and board of directors in 2013, and ended its business dealings in Eurasia in 2015.
Jonas Bengtsson, group general counsel hired by Telia in 2013 to help it through the scandal, explained in a company statement Feb. 15 that the outcome of the trial does not change the company's position that the settlement was in its best interests.
“The recently concluded court case and Telia company's settlement with the U.S. and Dutch authorities partly concern the same events, but they have been tried according to different legal frameworks—U.S. and Dutch laws for the company and Swedish law for the former employees,” Bengtsson said. “It is not unusual that an event is tried under different laws in different countries and that the outcome may differ.” He could not be reached for further comment.
Marie Ehrling, chair of the Telia's board, said in the statement, “I hope that [the Feb. 15] ruling will bring an end to a painful and costly chapter in Telia company's history.”
According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the company and its subsidiary paid about $331 million in bribes to an Uzbekistan government official between 2007 and 2010 so that Telia could enter the Uzbek telecoms market and receive other favorable treatment. The official reportedly was a deputy foreign minister and the daughter of Uzbekistan's dictator at the time. She was arrested and sentenced to five years in confinement in her country.
Details of the bribery scheme were contained in the DOJ's criminal information filed in U.S. district court in Manhattan, including how the three company co-conspirators entered contracts with the foreign official, set up a shell company and funneled several payments from New York bank accounts to the official, and even granted a share of stock to her “with the option to sell the shares back to Telia at a substantial profit.”
The three former executives argued at trial that their actions did not constitute bribery because the foreign official was not in charge of granting licenses to telecom companies. Prosecutors countered that she did in fact control the decisions about such licenses, even if someone else granted the licenses.
In dismissing the charges, the Stockholm District Court disagreed with the prosecution, saying under Swedish bribery law the money must be paid to someone with direct control over licensing. Prosecutors could still appeal the court's ruling.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllExits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250