Some Michigan State Faculty Ask Ousted General Counsel to Decline Pay Package
The request is led by Catherine Lindell, an associate professor who said the university's students and faculty will be dealing with the emotional and financial effects of the Larry Nassar scandal for years to come.
February 20, 2019 at 05:27 PM
4 minute read
A small group of Michigan State University faculty is asking that former General Counsel Robert Young, who helped lead the school through the Larry Nassar sexual abuse scandal, reject the nearly million-dollar payout he is receiving after being ousted earlier this month.
The request is led by Catherine Lindell, an associate professor in the college of natural science's department of integrative biology. Lindell said in an interview Wednesday that so far Young has not responded to her. Neither did he respond to messages from Corporate Counsel. The university declined to comment.
Lindell said she sent a letter to the general counsel's office recommending that Young reject the payout “because it was a poor time and context for someone to be getting such a large payout.”
She said the letter was signed by about 200 people, who were mostly faculty members joined by a few students and staff. Lindell said she was promised the letter would be forwarded to the ousted general counsel. She also sent copies to the board of trustees and various administrators.
Young had made a three-year contract part of his terms for accepting the job during the volatile period eight months ago when the school had already lost its previous president, its general counsel and an acting general counsel due to the scandal. Under the contract, he received $425,000 a year, with the full three years' worth of salary due if he were terminated without cause, which he was.
“We understand that there was a contract,” Lindell said, “but we made the recommendation that he decline the payment, given the crisis that Michigan State is going through.”
Lindell said the university's students and faculty will be dealing with the emotional and financial effects of the scandal for years to come.
Young negotiated a $500 million settlement with over 300 victims of the scandal, in which Nassar, a school sports doctor, abused more young women athletes under the guise of medical treatment. The university also faces millions of dollars in legal bills.
Although the university carried insurance against such claims, the insurance companies are fighting against paying for the settlement or for legal fees because the school failed to obey federal law requiring it to report abuse claims.
A recent U.S. Department of Education investigation found at least 11 abuse complaints to coaches, faculty or other university employees that were not reported to proper authorities or thoroughly investigated. The report blamed the office of general counsel for the lack of compliance, while under a previous general counsel.
Young, a former chief justice of the Michigan Supreme Court, was first hired in February 2018 by interim president John Engler to be special counsel to handle the Nassar legal matters. At the time, Young was of counsel in the Lansing office of Dickinson Wright, and the school's general counsel had just departed under pressure.
Young later told Corporate Counsel that Engler, a former governor of Michigan who had previously appointed Young to the court, was an old friend who offered him the general counsel job at that time. Young turned it down.
Then the school's acting general counsel resigned three months later, and Engler again asked Young to take the job and help the university through the scandal. This time Young took the position on June 1, 2018, after the board of trustees agreed to his three-year contract.
The board of trustees asked Engler to resign in mid-January. On Feb. 1, new acting President Satish Udpa abruptly fired Young, giving no public reason. Neither the school nor Young would discuss it. A search continues for his replacement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFormer Rutgers Law School Dean Replaces Hoffman as University General Counsel on Interim Basis
4 minute readAs Student Workers Unionize in Droves, NLRB Tries to Prevent Colleges' Privacy Concerns From Slowing Momentum
5 minute readDemise of Chevron Deference Likely Played a Major Role in Successful Title IX Challenges, Experts Say
4 minute readHarvard Hires Ex-Defense Department GC as Legal Chief at Tumultuous Time
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250