Twitter Expands Transparency Policies for Political Ads Ahead of EU, India and Australia Elections
Twitter is the latest tech company to update its political ad policy, increasing ad transparency in Australia, India and the European Union before their 2019 elections.
February 20, 2019 at 01:07 PM
3 minute read
Twitter became the latest social media platform to change its political campaigning ad policies Tuesday, announcing enhanced transparency features ahead of elections in Europe, India and Australia.
Social media companies, including Twitter, have faced criticism in recent years for their platforms' role in spreading politically motivated misinformation and hate speech. As of March 11, Twitter will only allow certified advertisers to run political campaign ads on its platform in all European Union member states, India and Australia, as all three face major elections in 2019.
Prospective political advertisers must apply for certification, Karen White, Twitter's director of public policy, Europe, said in a blog post Tuesday.
“Once proof of identity is verified, and advertisers meet our eligibility requirements, a letter with an access code will be posted to their address to confirm they are located within the EU,” White said in the post. “This will ensure that only EU-based individuals can advertise political campaign content on the service.”
She said Twitter will also publicly publish political ads' billing information, ad spend, targeted demographics and impressions per tweet in the platform's ads transparency center. An elections team composed of trust and safety, legal, public policy and other departments will work to prevent election interference on the platform.
The San Francisco-based company launched similar political campaign policies in the U.S. in May 2018, ahead of the country's November midterm elections. Last month, Carlos Monje Jr., Twitter's director of public policy and philanthropy, U.S. and Canada, published a review of the company's midterm election efforts.
Monje said Twitter identified some potential foreign attempts at election interference during the midterms, but found most voter suppression efforts were domestic. Still, he said in his post, threats could change in future elections.
“Elections are coming up around the world, and our goal is to protect their integrity to the best of our ability and to take the learnings from each with us,” he said. “Our role, as ever, is to do our best to stay one step ahead while remaining humble in the face of potential new challenges.”
Other U.S. tech companies, including Google and Facebook, have also revised political ad policies during elections. In May 2018, Facebook prohibited foreign actors from buying political ads in Ireland prior to the country's vote on a referendum to repeal the country's constitutional ban on abortion.
Menlo Park, California-based Facebook has been the main subject of international criticism for failing to curb fake news on its platform prior to the 2016 U.S. election.
“Our company approach is to build tools to increase transparency around political advertising so that people know who is paying for the ads they are seeing, and to ensure any organisation running a political ad is located in that country,” Facebook said in a May 2018 blog post announcing its policy in Ireland.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250