Complaint Against Facebook Offers Platforms a Chance to Update In-App Purchase Policies
Facebook became the latest tech platform to face a formal complaint over children's in-app gaming purchases on the site, with minor allegedly overspending on the site without parental consent. Here's how tech companies could prevent similar complaints and ensure COPPA compliance.
February 22, 2019 at 02:24 PM
4 minute read
Parent and consumer advocacy groups claim Facebook allowed children to make expensive in-app purchases on the platform without parental consent in a complaint filed to the Federal Trade Commission on Thursday.
Facebook isn't the first tech company to be hit with such a complaint; Apple Inc., Google and Amazon.com Inc. all previously faced FTC action following similar allegations. Lawyers and advocacy group leaders said there are ways tech companies can make online gaming safer for children and ensure their platforms comply with relevant data protection laws.
“Part of the problem was that after the initial credit card was approved, there was no further approval needed, so that kids could rack up all sorts of charges and the parents wouldn't know until those charges showed up on the credit card,” said Josh Golin, the executive director for Campaign for a Commercial Free Childhood, which signed onto the complaint against Facebook. “Really you should be getting parental consent before each credit card purchase.”
He said platforms shouldn't offer games with in-app purchases in children's sections, or should notify parents about the risks involved. That's because children may not know they're purchasing things in the game with real money, he said, or may feel they have to spend money in the game to progress.
Games that use loot crates, which allow players to pay extra for a chance to win valuable in-game items, have separately come under scrutiny from critics who say they're a form of gambling that can hook minors. State Rep. Chris Lee of Hawaii called for increased regulation of loot crates last year.
Michelle Cohen, a member attorney at Ifrah Law, said platforms that do wish to include games with in-app purchases could cap the amount children can spend in the game and notify parents when charges hit a set limit.
“I don't think the parents are always upset that [their child] bought something. It's the fact that the charges got out of control,” Cohen said. “So to me it would make sense to be setting a limit, and if you're going to let it go above, have some mobile verification.”
Thursday's complaint also alleged Facebook could have violated the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act.
Angela Campbell, a Georgetown Law professor and the director of the Institute for Public Representation Communications and Technology Clinic, said if Facebook knowingly collected children's data without adult consent, COPPA violations could come into play.
“If a kid has their own account and they lied about their age to get it, [the company] would have to kick them off Facebook,” Campbell said. “And if it's someone who is using a parent's account or grandparent's account, at the very least, they would have to delete any data that they collected from that child.”
Facebook users are supposed to be at least 13 years old, but Campbell noted that the platform offers games appealing to younger children.
According to the complaint, parents notified Facebook that their children used Facebook to play games. The Menlo Park, California-based company allegedly often denied parents' requests for purchases made by children. Facebook said it offers education for users on in-app purchases and provides pathways for refunds.
“We want people to have safe and enjoyable gaming experiences on Facebook, so providing resources to seek refunds for unauthorized purchases made in games is an important part of the platform,” a Facebook spokesperson said in an emailed statement Thursday. “We have in place mechanisms to prevent fraud at the time of purchase and we offer people the option to dispute purchases and seek refunds.”
The FTC confirmed it received the complaint against Facebook but declined to comment further.
Read More:
What's Inside the Loot Box? It Could Be Gaming's Next Big Problem.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Trending Stories
- 1Who Are the Judges Assigned to Challenges to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order?
- 2Litigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Womble Bond Becomes First Firm in UK to Roll Out AI Tool Firmwide
- 5Will a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to a Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250