Platforms for Freelance Attorneys Make Their Way to the Mainstream
As attorneys become less attached to the idea of staying with one corporation or decide to take time off, freelancing may be the model for the future.
February 22, 2019 at 03:10 PM
4 minute read
Corporations and their legal departments are under pressure to cut costs and find ways to maintain a high-quality level of work. The solution going forward may be to use platforms that connect corporate legal departments with freelance attorneys for more of the time-consuming and repetitive tasks.
“We combine best-in-class tech with high-quality attorneys to handle their high-volume or recurring needs. A lot of things like nondisclosure agreements and vendor agreements,” Ben Levi, co-founder and chief operating officer of InCloudCounsel, explained.
InCloudCounsel, which offers a platform for freelancers to do high-level repetitive legal work for corporations, operates generally in the financial industry, Levi explained. He said heads of legal departments are used to their lawyers sitting nearby.
“You have to explain to them that it is someone who used to sit in a big building downtown or they used to be doing all of this work at a much higher rate. And through the use of some software tools, we've been able to connect you guys in a way that makes things go much faster,” Levi explained.
There is also the question of the vetting process for a freelance attorney. Gary Tully, the head of legal operations at Gilead Sciences, said he would prefer to hire an attorney he could fully vet himself.
“There are cost-conscious companies who do just need a lawyer to take a look at something,” Tully said. “I think there is a market out there for it, I just don't see it being large corporations.”
Tully said if he were to ever consider pitching the use of freelance attorneys, the level of vetting would be extremely important.
“There is a level of vetting required even at the entry level. That's why I think when we hire a law firm, if we're using second-years, we expect a level of training and indoctrination into this type of work that the law firms provide,” Tully said.
Kristin Tyler, the co-founder of Lawclerk, said attorneys who hope to provide freelance services through Lawclerk must submit a resume, a biography and a writing sample. The attorneys then receive a grade from Lawclerk, which hiring corporate attorneys can see.
Levi explained that at InCloudCounsel the vetting process includes multiple interviews, a background check, a mark-up test of a document and bar status. He said the results of the vetting process are made available to whoever is hiring the freelancer.
“We want to make sure that our brand is synonymous with quality in the same way that a brand-name law firm is synonymous with having quality attorneys,” Levi explained.
The freelance model has appeared to have been embraced, Tyler said, with her company testing Lawclerk For General Counsel, a platform for corporate legal departments to hire freelance attorneys that will launch in the spring.
As the workforce changes and younger attorneys become more interested in taking time off to start a family or pursue other endeavors, the freelance model will likely grow, said Byron Buck, senior corporate counsel at Caterpillar Inc.
“It's good and I think it's probably going to get even better,” Buck said of the industry. “I think companies in a number of industries, as they learn and struggle with how to engage the new workforce, are going to find [platforms that offer freelance attorneys] to be a useful tool.” Buck noted his opinions do not reflect that of his company.
Levi said he believes the market for freelance attorneys will grow in the future.
“Our goal as a company is to provide value to both clients and to attorneys. On the client side, we think that our model that adds technology to a platform of freelance workers means that we are able to offer clients a way to do this work faster, better and cheaper,” Levi said. “On the attorney side, we really want to provide attorneys an alternative way to do legal work or to practice in a way that makes sense for them.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250