In-House Lawyers Face Growing Demands Due to Intense Regulatory Environment, Survey Finds
GCs are covering more areas of law and their roles have become “much more important due to the regulatory environment," according to the survey from K&L Gates and Forbes Insights. In-house respondents also said they were handling more tech-related issues, dealing with higher-stakes issues, and taking on more supervisory responsibilities over partners or vendors.
February 25, 2019 at 04:44 PM
3 minute read
The role of general counsel is becoming broader, more demanding and increasingly important due, at least in part, to today's intense and ever-changing regulatory environment, according to a new survey of U.S.-based business and legal executives in the financial services industry.
The report from K&L Gates and Forbes Insights also found that over the next three years the most in-demand lawyers will be those who have expertise with regulatory compliance, fraud protection, risk management, data protection and consumer law compliance.
The findings are based on the responses of 200 executives in organizations of various sizes and within different financial sectors, from asset management and capital markets to financial technology and economic development banking.
When asked how their role had changed over the last three years, 48 percent of the corporate counsel included in the survey said they were covering more areas of law, while 43 percent said their role was “much more important due to the regulatory environment.”
Nearly 20 percent said they were handling more tech-related issues; 17 percent were dealing with higher-stakes issues, such as penalties and lawsuits; and 16 percent said they had more supervisory responsibilities over partners or vendors.
Corporate counsel “have to become much more conversant in a broader set of issues than ever before,” said Keith Atkinson, managing director and associate general counsel of Nuveen LLC, the Charlotte, North Carolina-based asset management unit of the Fortune 100 financial services organization Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America-College Retirement Equities Fund. His comments were included in the survey.
“We really have pivoted much more to become business lawyers, to really understand the desired outcomes of our clients, to understand what our peers and competitors are doing, but also understand the regulatory risks of taking certain actions,” added Atkinson.
Survey respondents said they expect general counsel to have a “wide arrange of competencies,” including industry knowledge, predictive thinking and an understanding of the disruptive forces affecting the financial services industry.
Peter Germain, executive vice president and chief legal officer of Federated Investors Inc., stated in the report that he's seen a host of major changes since he joined the Pittsburgh-based financial services firm in 1984, when employees were using electric typewriters.
He said “the next phase will be even more revolutionary with the power that's going to be at the fingertips of legal and compliance professionals.”
Some other noteworthy findings:
- Nearly 70 percent of respondents cited virtual and cryptocurrencies as the highest tech-related risks that they face, followed by robo-advisers, blockchain and robotic process automation application programming interfaces.
- When asked what trends, areas or functions presented the most potential for legal risks, the vast majority of respondents—69 percent—cited dealing with data. Cybersecurity and a changing regulatory environment were also seen as significant risks.
- Almost half of respondents viewed fintech firms as partners and 72 percent of organizations said they need fintech to stay competitive. At the same time, though, only 39 percent believed fintech was necessary for their survival.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFinancial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readGC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250