As More Countries Seek Adequacy Decisions With EU, Will US Get Left Behind?
“All these major economic areas are taking an omnibus approach to data protection,” while the U.S. "is still focused very much sectorally on how it regulates data protection,” said a London-based privacy and cybersecurity expert. A federal data privacy law would open the door for a U.S.-EU adequacy decision under the GDPR. But such a law appears to be a tough sell at the moment.
February 26, 2019 at 05:32 PM
5 minute read
Now that Japan has secured an adequacy decision under the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation, opening a channel of free-flowing data between the two jurisdictions, several other countries are expected to follow suit. But the U.S. is not among them.
The European Commission announced in late January that Japan had successfully negotiated the first adequacy decision under the GDPR. The agreement between Japan and the EU created the “world's largest area of safe data flows,” according to a statement from European Commissioner Věra Jourová.
“Europeans' data will benefit from high privacy standards when their data is transferred to Japan. Our companies will also benefit from a privileged access to a 127 million consumers' market,” Jourová added. “Investing in privacy pays off; this arrangement will serve as an example for future partnerships in this key area and help set global standards.”
Under the GDPR, EU member countries are not allowed to transfer personal data to countries that are outside the EU and lack adequate data protection. To secure an adequacy decision under the GDPR, Japan made data protection assurances to the EU and agreed to implement new rules to bring its data protection system in line with the European regulations. Japan also created a framework for handling data-related complaints from Europeans.
Rohan Massey, a London-based partner at Ropes & Gray who leads the firm's privacy and cybersecurity practice, said in an interview Tuesday that South Korea is negotiating an adequacy decision with the EU while India and Mexico have shown interest in doing the same. He expected that Brazil, which passed sweeping data protection legislation last year, also would seek an adequacy decision.
“All these major economic areas are taking an omnibus approach to data protection,” Massey said. But he noted that the U.S. hasn't hopped aboard that data protection train and “is still focused very much sectorally on how it regulates data protection.”
“The U.S. has been very commercially driven in its approach,” he added.
As more countries pass comprehensive data protection laws, the U.S. has continued to follow a segmented approach with specific agencies regulating certain types of data and some states passing their own privacy laws, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act.
A federal data privacy law would open the door for a U.S.-EU adequacy decision under the GDPR. But such a law appears to be a tough sell at the moment.
“The U.S. will not have an adequacy decision until it has a nationwide privacy law, so we're not really in the ballpark to have that kind of [adequacy] decision,” said David Peloquin, an associate at Ropes & Gray in Boston who specializes in clinical research and health data privacy. “The bottom line is we're nowhere close to an adequacy decision in the U.S.”
Many of Peloquin's clients are medical researchers and are unable to participate in the Privacy Shield data transfer network that allows certain stateside companies under the jurisdiction of the Federal Trade Commission or Department of Transportation to transfer data between the EU and U.S.
U.S.-based organizations that are ineligible for Privacy Shield certification, including Peloquin's nonprofit clients, typically have to rely on standard contractual clauses to transfer data with the EU, according to Peloquin. He said many of his clients are unable to comply with certain terms found in those contracts.
“The problem with that is that the terms of those contracts require that you, for example, agree to jurisdiction of the European court,” he said. “It has really stalled some important research because we're unable to get data transferred from Europe to the U.S.”
In the past day alone, Peloquin said he's heard from two major university clients who were dealing with EU-related data transfer headaches. He's been considering certain potential solutions, including bespoke contracts that must receive approval from EU data protection authorities. But that route “takes a lot time, like months and months,” he said.
“We have this fundamental problem that we're all trying to work around,” he added.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCorporate Counsel's 2024 Award Winners Performed Legal Wizardry, Gave a Hand Up to Others
'We’re Here to Empower People to Make Good Decisions': Why Compliance Chiefs Must Learn to Think Like a Businessperson
High-Flying Genetics Testing Firm GeneDx Hires Ex-Zoetis GC as Legal Chief
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250