Re-emergence Will Require New Toys R Us Lawyers to Wear Business Hats: Restructuring Experts
In addition to focusing on licensing and IP matters, as well as general corporate legal work, the attorneys at Tru Kids Brands also will face some business challenges, corporate restructuring experts said.
February 26, 2019 at 03:35 PM
4 minute read
Iconic toy store chain Toys R Us is touting its emergence as a new company with new leadership, new vision and a new global strategy. For general counsel James Young, the development also means a new title.
Young is now GC and executive vice president of global license management at Parsippany, New Jersey-based Tru Kids Brands, the current owner of Toys R Us, Babies R Us, longtime brand face Geoffrey the Giraffe and several other consumer toy and baby brands. He joined Toys R Us as corporate counsel in January 2007 and ascended to the top lawyer spot in November 2017, when the then-GC of only 10 months left amid its bankruptcy filing.
“Despite unprecedented efforts to capture the U.S. market share this past holiday season, there is still a significant gap and huge consumer demand for the trusted experience that Toys 'R' Us and Babies 'R' Us delivers,” Tru Kids president and CEO Richard Barry said in a statement announcing the new company. “We have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to write the next chapter of Toys 'R' Us by launching a newly imagined omni channel retail experience for our beloved brands here in the U.S. In addition, our strong global footprint is led by experienced and passionate operating teams that are 100 percent focused on growth.”
Through a Tru Kids spokesperson, Young, as well as the company, declined to comment beyond the press release about his new role. But Corporate Counsel spoke with attorneys who have worked with retailers to get a sense of what challenges and duties Young and his legal department of over a dozen lawyers will have to navigate in this re-emergence world.
And Young's new title is reflective of one of those responsibilities, said Timothy Duggan, a shareholder at Stark & Stark in Lawrenceville, New Jersey.
“On the legal side, they're going to be spending a lot of time looking at licensing agreements,” he said. “Licensing and ensuring that trademarks are protected in the countries they are going into is going to be really important.”
Beyond these matters, however, Duggan added, the work may not be overly unique from other retail companies that have emerged from bankruptcy and likely will include general corporate legal work, including tax issues associated with forming subsidiaries, as well as e-commerce and international law matters.
Leslie Berkoff, a partner at Long Island, New York-based Moritt Hock & Hamroff, said that Young's department also will be working to make sure that vendors and other third parties negotiating with the new company are aware of its rights and do not carry over matters that were discharged and released in the bankruptcy.
But at least for the near future, Berkoff added, the situation may require the GC to don his business adviser hat just as much as his legal one.
“There will be some legal questions, but a lot of it will be business-focused,” she said, noting that vendors may now be leery of working with this company.
“Not only do you have to go back and restore good graces, you're going to have others you're going to have to woo,” Berkoff said. “They have looked at the market share and said, 'Yes, we have a place in this industry. People miss us, and we're going to do it differently.'”
She continued, speaking of vendors, as well as consumers: “You may only get one shot with these people, and you may not get them back a third time.”
Brad Sandler, a partner at Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones, agreed, saying Tru Kids must deal with how they are going to communicate with the vendor community, particularly companies such as Mattel and Hasbro, and landlords, going to great lengths to provide them with adequate assurance of future payment.
“I would think that some of the vendors are going to be gun-shy about doing business with the new Toys R Us,” he said, adding that vendors may likely have some influence over the new company, perhaps requiring that it establish trade terms that could be as short as a week or demanding to see “behind the curtain” financial information.
“I think there are legal issues in terms of people negotiating with them aggressively because of their history,” Berkoff said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readNike Promotes Legal Chief to Marketing Chief as New CEO Launches Turnaround
King Kullen—the Nation's First Supermarket—Hires Outside Counsel as GC
CLO of Yum Brands Exiting After 17 Years With Fast-Food Giant
Trending Stories
- 1'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
- 2Class Action Filed Against Houston Health Savings Account Firm for Allegedly Confiscating Client Funds
- 3These 2 Lawyers Just Became Florida Judges
- 4'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
- 5Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250