3 Ways Legal Counsel Can Use Technology to Hire Better and Spend Less
Technology can help to build, manage and unite a legal team, allowing organizations to run leaner and spend less.
February 27, 2019 at 02:41 PM
5 minute read
Technology is reducing overhead for many industries. The only problem is, law firms are notoriously slow to adapt. A study found that 87 percent of law professionals still use pen and paper to complete their work, even though two-thirds of these same professionals have access to technology. Knowing they have the necessary resources, law firms must do a better job of leveraging those technological solutions.
With the right technology, a legal team can improve collaboration and can better track performance, manage budgets, and operate lean. The right technology can also improve teams' abilities to source job candidates by helping them quickly identify the right talent for the job—be it full-time, part-time, etc.—which can save both time and money.
This, of course, isn't to say that technology alone can reduce spending. Working to break down silos and become more agile as a team is also important for improving collaboration and reducing waste.
Waste Not, Want Not
Meeting evolving market demands requires fast, efficient adaptation. An agile legal department utilizes cross-functional teams to cut down on bureaucracy and get more accomplished. In this model, work looks like mission-based projects, which might be staffed by a lean core of full-time employees alongside a flexible bench of on-demand experts.
Improving cross-functionality in this way can also make a company more attractive to potential hires. Who wouldn't want to work for an employer with the resources to quickly respond and adapt to market demands? That adaptability brings security that attracts prospective employees.
Technology can be a critical tool for general counsel—or legal departments in general—to leverage for making better hires and limiting their spending. The following are often the best places to start:
1. Re-evaluate hiring protocols.
Besides driving up talent acquisition costs, recruiters' antiquated approaches can often slow the hiring process. While recruiting platforms like Indeed and CareerBuilder are trusted outreach resources, they're just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to innovative recruiting solutions.
Because legal roles can be so difficult to fill, companies have turned to nontraditional recruiting platforms for help finding qualified talent. One way to do this is to leverage technology that eliminates a portion of the recruiting process and allows companies to focus on bigger-picture tasks. Find a technological solution that hires and manages remote contract attorneys and paralegals and can access an algorithmically curated, on-demand workforce with one click. Use this solution to streamline the normal hiring process and get employees in place faster.
A traditional recruiting service requires a retainer fee or a payment to even access a candidate. Instead, look for a technology solution that can reduce those costs and allow a general counsel to invest that money into a culture-building event or something else that benefits the whole team.
2. Build an agile legal team.
When a business is changing rapidly, contracting project-specific flexible legal professionals doesn't just save legal departments money—it also improves team agility by allowing it to provide a wider array of services to its clientele. What's more, project-specific clients rarely find themselves constrained by silos, allowing for greater collaboration and fewer bottlenecks.
The Muse, a platform that each year helps more than 50 million people succeed in their careers, employs a tech-enabled, on-demand legal workforce to streamline operations for its sales team. As needs arise, the company brings in a specialized attorney to help negotiate, formalize, and execute agreements. While this frees up time for its general counsel to focus on more strategic initiatives, it also allows the company to better respond to the fluctuating needs of the business. More importantly, it helps save thousands of dollars when compared with hiring a law firm.
3. Outsource more than insource.
Cost is probably the biggest difference between outsourcing and insourcing, or delegating tasks in-house. Insourcing requires a company to develop new work processes, which can be a great expense to a legal department. By exclusively outsourcing certain tasks, companies can rely on an existing workflow and team equipped for the task at hand, making the launch of a project or initiative much more affordable and efficient.
Legal departments can also keep costs down by leaning on technology. Plenty of legal operations software solutions can help manage the day-to-day law needs and even help with contract negotiations. Sure, the general counsel will still handle complex matters, but legal and new tech like Carta or Zenefits can certainly manage more administrative tasks.
The manner in which legal teams are staffed continues to evolve. Technology is a large part of this and can help build, manage, and unite a team, allowing organizations to run leaner and spend less.
Raad Ahmed is the founder and CEO of LawTrades Apex, a hiring platform that empowers in-house teams to quickly hire flexible legal talent backed by tools and management support. Imagined as the “world's tech-enabled workforce,” Ahmed envisions LawTrades to replace traditional legal staffing with software that deploys an agile team of attorneys and paralegals that streamlines legal spend and boosts productivity.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Corporate Confidentiality Unlocked: Leveraging Common Interest Privilege for Effective Collaboration
11 minute readTrending Stories
- 111th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 2Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 3'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 4Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
- 5On the Move and After Hours: Meyner and Landis; Cooper Levenson; Ogletree Deakins; Saiber
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250