Tobacco Companies Support Legislation Raising Smoking Age
According to Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, Hawaii, California, New Jersey, Oregon, Maine, Massachusetts and Virginia have laws that raised the age from 18 to 21 for consumers to purchase and use tobacco products.
February 27, 2019 at 06:16 PM
4 minute read
With seven states having passed laws that make it illegal to buy tobacco under the age of 21, the push for further state and federal legislation to increase the age when people can buy and use tobacco products is supported by the tobacco industry.
However, those who have fought big tobacco companies in court say the industries' support of these bills is a last-ditch effort to save itself from further scrutiny and try to avoid even stricter regulations.
According to Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, Hawaii, California, New Jersey, Oregon, Maine, Massachusetts and Virginia have laws that raised the age from 18 to 21 for consumers to purchase and use tobacco products.
Scott Schlesinger, an attorney at Schlesinger Law Offices in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, who represents plaintiffs in Engle progeny smoking-related injury suits, said that tobacco companies are only now supporting the efforts to raise the age to buy tobacco products because they know that kind of legislation will take a long time to go through.
“They could choose not to sell to people under 21,” Schlesinger said.
In an opinion piece published on The Hill on Tuesday, Altria CEO Howard Willard said he also supports raising the age of buying and using tobacco products to the age of 21 since it would lead to a lower addiction rate.
A representative for Altria on Wednesday said the company supports raising the minimum age for using tobacco products.
“We agree that the current trends in underage e-vapor use must be addressed. Tobacco harm reduction for adults cannot succeed without effective measures to reduce underage use of all tobacco products,” the representative wrote in an email. “The best approach to achieving this goal is to increase the minimum age for purchasing tobacco products to 21. We fully support states acting now to pass legislation to increase the minimum age. Taking this important step will address the main way underage youth gain access to tobacco products today—from friends who are of legal age.”
In November, Murray Garnick, the general counsel of Altria, said in a press release that he supported state laws and federal laws to raise the age to buy tobacco products.
“We welcome [the] FDA's efforts to address the underage use of e-vapor products. That is why we believe Congress should raise the legal age of purchase for all tobacco products to 21,” Garnick said in the press release. “We also applaud [the] FDA's continued recognition of the potential for innovative, less harmful products that can deliver nicotine to adults who want them.”
A representative for tobacco company RAI Group said no one was available for comment on Wednesday.
“The RAI Group believes that youth should never use tobacco products, including vapor products, and we support federal and state legislation that increases the minimum age of purchase to 21 in the U.S.,” the representative wrote in an email to Corporate Counsel. “Because many youth obtain vapor products from friends between the ages of 18 and 21, raising the age of purchase to 21 will help prevent teens from acquiring the products through social sources, thereby keeping vapor products out of middle and high schools.”
Ted Kwon, a spokesman for Juul, which is partially owned by Altria, said the company is committed to preventing teenagers from becoming addicted to tobacco products.
“Tobacco 21 laws have been shown to dramatically reduce youth smoking rates, which is why we strongly support raising the minimum purchase age for all tobacco products, including vaping products like JUUL, to 21,” Kwon said in an email to Corporate Counsel. “Our secure website, JUUL.com, already requires all purchasers to be 21 and over. We look forward to working with policymakers at the federal, state and local levels to achieve Tobacco 21.”
Vince Willmore, the vice president of communications at Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, explained that many tobacco companies seek to have Tobacco 21 laws passed over stricter laws banning the sale of flavored tobacco products. He said the laws the tobacco industry tends to support lack enforcement on the tobacco industry and would rather punish underage consumers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readQuantum Computing Company to Part With General Counsel
CLOs Still Jazzed About Gen Al, Even as They Realize Successfully Implementing It Is Harder Than It Looks
2 minute readAT&T General Counsel Joins ADM Board as Company Reels From Accounting Scandal
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 2Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 3In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 4Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 5The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250