What Spinoff Old Navy, Gap's 'NewCo' Will Need in Their GCs
Following the news of its split into two independent retail companies, Gap Inc.'s "NewCo" will need a GC prepared to handle the challenges associated with the legacy brands, while the new Old Navy's top lawyer must bring flexibility to the growth company, experts say.
March 01, 2019 at 04:37 PM
4 minute read
When Gap Inc. completes its planned split into two independent retail companies next year, there could be very different attorneys at the helm of each business' legal department, experts told Corporate Counsel.
The San Francisco-based clothing giant announced Thursday that its Old Navy brand will spin off into a new publicly traded company, while namesake Gap and its legacy brands, including Banana Republic and Athleta, will form a separate to-be-named business now dubbed “NewCo.”
“It's clear that Old Navy's business model and customers have increasingly diverged from our specialty brands over time, and each company now requires a different strategy to thrive moving forward,” Gap board chairman Robert Fisher said in a statement that nods to the fact that Gap currently is more troubled than Old Navy, which remains the brand's strongest label.
The statement also said that current Gap president and CEO Art Peck will become CEO of NewCo, while current Old Navy president and CEO Sonia Syngal will lead the new spun-off Old Navy.
A Gap spokesperson did not return an email asking for comment about the fate of Gap's legal department, including that of executive vice president, global general counsel, corporate secretary and chief compliance officer Julie Gruber.
However, the announcement of top leadership could provide some insight, said Christopher Sagers, a law professor at Cleveland State University's Marshall College of Law.
“NewCo boss will want to take his management team with him,” Sagers said, predicting that Gruber will likely head up that legal department.
Chelsea Grayson, former general counsel at American Apparel who also served in the CEO role there and now serves as CEO at True Religion Apparel Inc., agreed but not necessarily for the exact same reason.
Because of the challenges NewCo will face, particularly in the short term, its general counsel will need to be a “very seasoned veteran,” she said, adding that spun-off Old Navy likely will bring on as its top lawyer “someone very dynamic from a very cool brand.”
A general counsel “has to be flexible to be at a growth company,” Grayson said. It has “to be somebody who is familiar with the sorts of deals that one would do at a company that's engaged in state-of-the-art marketing, that involve social media across all channels and platforms and that [involve a] state-of-the-art e-commerce initiative. It will be somebody who has all of that in their toolkit.”
While that lawyer likely will be bringing new perspective to new Old Navy, NewCo's top lawyer will be dealing with the challenges associated with the legacy brand assets, including streamlining its brick-and-mortar fleet by shutting more than 200 of these brand stores over the next two years.
“That is always a big deal that heavily involves the GC because state and federal [laws governing layoffs] must be complied with,” she said.
In addition, Grayson said, this general counsel likely will be involved in the restructuring and streamlining of internal processes and work closely with outside consultants if any are brought in, as well as the person who manages human resources so that the general counsel can adequately mind the company's corporate culture.
“People left behind at NewCo are going to feel just that—left behind—so the GC has to have their finger on the pulse of how that could affect culture,” she said.
To Dennis O'Rourke, partner and co-chair of the corporate department at Moritt Hock & Hamroff, whoever fills the general counsel role at each company will need to understand the workings of a transition from one entity to two separate companies that operate independently from each other.
“Everyone involved in a transaction like this is focused on the date that it's going to happen, but the focus needs to be as much, if not more so, on what happens the day after it occurs,” he said. “The company that transitions better will perform better, and that's as applicable to a legal department as much as it is to a business.”
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz is advising Gap Inc. in the spinoff transaction, according to the company's statement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readNike Promotes Legal Chief to Marketing Chief as New CEO Launches Turnaround
King Kullen—the Nation's First Supermarket—Hires Outside Counsel as GC
CLO of Yum Brands Exiting After 17 Years With Fast-Food Giant
Trending Stories
- 1'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
- 2Class Action Filed Against Houston Health Savings Account Firm for Allegedly Confiscating Client Funds
- 3These 2 Lawyers Just Became Florida Judges
- 4'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
- 5Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250