Comedian Claims Barstool Sports General Counsel Offered Her a $50 Gift Card to Retract Copyright Notice
Comedian Miel Bredouw tweeted a series of emails from Barstool Sports' general counsel Mark Marin. The GC offered her a $50 gift card to retract a DMCA takedown notice against the sports blog, which republished a video she created in December.
March 05, 2019 at 03:21 PM
3 minute read
A comedian took to Twitter Monday with allegations that Barstool Sports' general counsel offered her a $50 gift card to retract a copyright takedown notice against the blog.
Miel Bredouw said she filed a Digital Millennium Copyright Act takedown notice against Barstool in December, after the blog reuploaded a video she created to Twitter without credit or consent. Shortly after, Bredouw said she began receiving messages and emails from Barstool staff, including general counsel Mark Marin.
According to her tweets, Bredouw didn't respond to any of Barstool's attempts to contact her. But Marin continued to reach out, eventually upping his offer to $2,000 on Monday.
I honestly thought it was finally over after two weeks of silence. Until this morning, I get another email from legal guy now offering me $2000. Which I would never take (10000% fuck barstool sports) but EVEN IF I wanted to… extortion? Like in what world. pic.twitter.com/s561QpZBPX
— miel (@miel) March 4, 2019
Bredouw posted about Barstool's slew of emails and messages when, shortly after the $2,000 offer, she received a message from Twitter alerting her that the blog submitted a DMCA counter notice. Twitter's message said the platform would “cease disabling access” to her video in 10 business days, restoring Barstool's access to the footage unless she filed an action seeking a court order.
She declined to comment on whether she'd seek a court order in emails with Corporate Counsel. Barstool did not immediately respond to request for comment.
Thank you for assuming I must have ONE HELL OF A video but the likely truth is a much bigger bummer: if they get too many DMCA copyright strikes, Twitter has to legally delete their account. I believe they get six. How much you want to bet mine was their fifth?
— miel (@miel) March 4, 2019
Twitter leaves it up to the parties to resolve DMCA takedown issues after a counter notice is filed. The platform's current copyright policy says it “cannot offer any legal advice” and suggests those with further questions “consult an attorney.” Twitter's policy does threaten action against accounts with multiple DMCA violations, which Bredouw hinted could be the reason Barstool pushed for her retraction; Barstool did not comment.
“If multiple copyright complaints are received Twitter may lock accounts or take other actions to warn repeat violators. … Under appropriate circumstances we may suspend user accounts under our repeat infringer policy,” Twitter's current policy reads. “However, we may take retractions and counter-notices into account when applying our repeat infringer policy.”
The DMCA requires that platforms adopt and implement a policy to remove accounts “who are repeat infringers.” Twitter did not immediately respond to request for comment on its copyright policy.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Taps McKinsey CLO Pierre Gentin for Commerce Department GC
Longtime Purdue GC Accused of Drunken Driving Hires Big-Name Defense Attorney
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Thursday Newspaper
- 2Public Notices/Calendars
- 3Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-117
- 4Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 5Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250