DOJ Cites Lack of Oversight in Bribery Case Against Russian Mobile Phone Company
MTS's “failure to implement effective internal accounting controls” had allowed the company's executives and others to get away for years with disguising the bribery payments on the company's books as acquisition costs, option payments, purchases of regulatory assets and charitable donations, according to the DOJ.
March 07, 2019 at 04:43 PM
4 minute read
Russia's largest mobile network operator, Mobile TeleSystems, has agreed to pay $850 million to settle a corruption case that highlights the importance of having effective internal accounting controls.
MTS allegedly violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act by paying at least $420 million in bribes from 2004 to 2012 to Gulnara Karimova, the 46-year-old daughter of ex-Uzbekistan President Islam Karimov, who died in 2016. Karimova also was a Uzbek official who held sway over the country's telecom operations.
The alleged bribes allowed Moscow-based MTS to enter the Uzbekistan telecom market, where it operated for eight years and generated more than $2.4 billion in revenues, according to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Department of Justice. MTS will pay $100 million to the SEC in the settlement, while the DOJ credited that amount to the $850 million it calculated as a criminal penalty.
MTS's stock price dropped nearly 3 percent Wednesday.
The DOJ asserted in a plea agreement that MTS's “failure to implement effective internal accounting controls” had allowed the company's executives and others to get away for years with disguising the bribery payments on the company's books as acquisition costs, option payments, purchases of regulatory assets and charitable donations.
The DOJ's finding was based, at least in part, on an internal investigation of MTS's activities in Uzbekistan. New York-based Debevoise & Plimpton conducted that investigation on behalf of MTS “under the auspices of the MTS Audit Committee,” according to a spokeswoman for the law firm. She could not immediately provide additional details about the firm's involvement in the case.
MTS is the third telecom company to pay penalties to resolve allegations connected to bribery schemes in Uzbekistan. The three cases have spurred a total of $2.6 billion in recoveries for the SEC, DOJ and foreign authorities. The other two telecom companies, Netherlands-based telecom VimpelCom Ltd. and Swedish telecom Telia Co., reached settlements with authorities in 2016 and 2017, respectively.
“This is the third installment in a trilogy of cases arising from an almost $1 billion bribery scheme that reached the highest echelons of the Uzbekistan government and was orchestrated by some of the largest telecommunications companies in the world,” said Geoffrey Berman, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York.
Charles Cain, chief of the SEC Enforcement Division's FCPA Unit, described MTS's conduct as “egregious” and said “building business on a foundation of bribery leaves the business and American investor interests at the mercy of corrupt officials.”
Meanwhile, MTS President and CEO Alexey Kornya issued a statement Wednesday in which he asserted that the company “has systematically and proactively developed its current anti-corruption compliance framework in line with international best practices within a dedicated compliance division since 2012.” That was the same year that the Uzbek government expropriated MTS's Uzbek operations.
Karimova was indicted in the Southern District of New York on Wednesday on one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering. Former Uzbek executive Bekhzod Akhmedov was charged in the same indictment with one count of conspiracy to violate the FCPA, two counts of violating the FCPA, and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering.
MTS has entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the DOJ and has agreed to have an independent compliance monitor for at least three years, “implement rigorous internal controls,” and cooperate with the DOJ's ongoing investigation, which includes Akhmedov and Karimova.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute readDog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1AI: An Enhancement, Not a Replacement for Attorneys
- 2Fowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
- 3Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
- 4'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
- 5Call for Nominations: TLI's Pennsylvania Legal Awards 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250