LexisNexis General Counsel Talks Legal Tech, Sticking to a Budget and the Rise of In-House Counsel
Ian McDougall, the general counsel of LexisNexis, offered his predictions on legal tech adoption, increasing legal department sizes and changing inside-outside counsel relationships at a Stanford event.
March 07, 2019 at 03:43 PM
3 minute read
The general counsel of legal research company LexisNexis Group offered his predictions for the industry's future at a Stanford University event Wednesday.
Ian McDougall, LexisNexis' general counsel and executive vice president, led the ”2008-2018: Decade of Disruption?” discussion, which was hosted by CodeX: the Stanford Center for Legal Informatics in Palo Alto, California. He began by walking attendees through mid-2000s legal industry trends he claims were exacerbated by the 2008 financial crisis: in-house hiring and tech use.
“Why were companies jumping on the rise of the in-house counsel bandwagon? Because the global financial crisis required companies to be more cost conscious than ever before,” McDougall said. “The advantage to a company of the in-house counsel is certainty of cost.”
The recession didn't just accelerate an exodus in-house, McDougall said. It's also led to a stronger focus on value, or quality over quantity, when it comes to hiring outside counsel. He noted more companies have adopted a panel model of firms and alternative fee arrangements in recent years.
That's because alternative fee arrangements and structured relationships with firms provide more cost certainty—something crucial to general counsel sticking to a tight budget.
“I have conversations with law firms very often … and I'm sure they don't believe me when I say to them that we are after quality and not necessarily the cheapest one,” McDougall said. “We're after value for money. And one of the biggest elements of that is predictability. Can you give me a predictable cost?”
An increased focus on efficiency and value has also led in-house counsel to tap into advancing legal tech, according to McDougall. General counsel don't want to pay outside counsel high rates for a job that could be done by a computer.
That doesn't mean firms are going away. But he predicts firm lawyers' relationship with in-house counsel, and the value they provide clients, will change. He said outside counsel will no longer “regurgitate law” to clients. Instead, they'll walk them through an unfamiliar process.
They'll also provide a deep understanding of legal technology, McDougall predicted, as will in-house counsel to internal clients. Lawyers adopting and embracing a new era of legal tech are the ones “who are going to survive” changes in the industry, he warned.
“Companies of all kinds have to have a clear strategy, in my view, to deal with the technological changes,” McDougall said.
Read More:
General Counsel Need to Seek Flat Fees More, Research Finds
Becoming a Trusted Adviser in the Age of Disruption
Corporate Legal Eagles Start to Embrace Artificial Intelligence
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
- 1AIAs: A Look At the Future of AI-Related Contracts
- 2Litigators of the Week: A $630M Antitrust Settlement for Automotive Software Vendors—$140M More Than Alleged Overcharges
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Linklaters Hires Four Partners From Patterson Belknap
- 5Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250