Huawei Chief Legal Officer Says Posing a Security Threat to Other Countries Would Be 'Suicide'
Huawei's chief lawyer said in an interview with Bloomberg the U.S. ban on Huawei's products had hurt the company and its reputation. But he asserted that Huawei would only leave the U.S. as a "last resort."
March 08, 2019 at 04:34 PM
3 minute read
Despite having sustained “huge losses” as a result of the U.S. government's ban on Huawei Technologies Co.'s products, the Chinese telecom giant has no plans to abandon the American market, according to Huawei Chief Legal Officer Song Liuping.
Liuping said in an interview with Bloomberg that a law barring U.S. government agencies from buying or using Huawei's goods or services had “damaged many aspects of Huawei's business.”
“We could lose existing projects as well as further opportunities. Our partners may stop working with us as it damages Huawei's global reputation,” he said. But he added the U.S. accounts for 20 percent to 30 percent of the global telecom market and that “leaving the U.S. market is really only a last resort.”
“We haven't fully considered exiting the U.S.,” he said.
Liuping made his remarks after Huawei announced Wednesday it had filed a federal lawsuit against the U.S. government in an effort to overturn the ban on its products, which the company argues is unconstitutional.
Addressing concerns that Huawei is engaged in espionage for the Chinese government, Liuping asserted that there is “no evidence to prove Huawei poses any threat to other countries. As a business, posing any threat to other countries or cybersecurity would be like suicide.”
He added Huawei has “never received any request from any government, including the Chinese government, to extort any back doors for intelligence.”
“In the future, we will also refuse to take such a request, be it from the Chinese government or any government in the world,” he said.
President Donald Trump has suggested he would intervene in the U.S. Department of Justice's criminal case against Huawei's chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou, the daughter of Huawei's founder, if he thought it would help America reach a trade deal with China.
Wanzhou was arrested in December in Canada at the behest of U.S. authorities, who are still seeking her extradition on fraud charges.
While Liuping asserted that Wanzhou's arrest was politically motivated, he noted Huawei did not welcome Trump's intervention in the case, saying, “We don't agree that administrative power should intervene in the judicial system. We believe in judicial independence.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElaine Darr Brings Transformation and Value to DHL's Business
PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
Datasite's Ethics and Compliance Team Drives Transformation
SEC Obtained Record $8.2 Billion in Financial Remedies for Fiscal Year 2024, Commission Says
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250