US Sanction of Russian Bank Shows OFAC's Broad Reach, Says Former Treasury Official
A former senior sanctions policy adviser for the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control described the Evrofinance sanction as a “two-for-one” move that ratchets up the pressure on Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and shows that “dealing with state-owned Russian financial institutions is a high-risk proposition.”
March 11, 2019 at 06:01 PM
4 minute read
Dealing with state-owned Russian financial institutions—already a risky proposition for many U.S. companies—is even riskier now in the wake of the Treasury Department's announcement Monday that it had sanctioned a Russian bank for allegedly attempting to sidestep U.S. sanctions on Venezuela, according to a former U.S. sanctions official.
The Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control added Moscow-based Evrofinance Mosnarbank to the U.S. sanctions list after finding the bank had continued to “maintain its significant relationship” with the regime of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro.
Russian and Venezuelan state-owned companies control Evrofinance, which was founded in 2011 to finance joint Russia-Venezuela oil and infrastructure projects, according to the Treasury.
Evrofinance did not immediately respond to a request for comment. But the bank has stated it “will unconditionally fulfill all its obligations to customers and partners in full,” according to Bloomberg.
Michael Dobson, former senior sanctions policy adviser for the Office of Foreign Assets Control, described the Evrofinance sanction as a “two-for-one” move that ratchets up the pressure on Maduro and shows that “dealing with state-owned Russian financial institutions is a high-risk proposition.”
The main takeaway for U.S. companies worried about potential sanctions violations is that the Treasury isn't focusing solely on Venezuelan entities, Dobson said: “They're also looking at non-Venezuelan parties who are helping prop up the Maduro regime.”
He added companies and their legal departments need to ask, ”Is this a risky entity to be dealing with and also is this entity active in a sanctions hot space?”
Dobson, now of counsel at Morrison & Foerster in Washington, D.C., believed that the Trump administration was “trying to signal that there are others who should take notice that the U.S. isn't going to continue to tolerate actors meddling in the Western Hemisphere, and Venezuela in particular, without fear of repercussions.”
“So far, they've targeted corruption networks around the Maduro regime,” he said.
Dobson added the action shows the “breadth of [OFAC's] sanctions authority,” which he said “allows OFAC broad discretion to go after anyone that they view as, and can make a legally defensible case of, supporting the Maduro regime.”
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said in a prepared statement that sanctioning Evrofinance “demonstrates that the United States will take action against foreign financial institutions that sustain the illegitimate Maduro regime and contribute to the economic collapse and humanitarian crisis plaguing the people of Venezuela.”
The Treasury asserted that Evrofinance's net assets increased by more than 50 percent during 2018, when the bank allegedly financed Venezuelan cryptocurrency Petro as part of an effort to help the country circumvent U.S. sanctions.
Evrofinance also is accused of assisting Venezuela state-owned oil company Petróleos de Venezuela SA, or PDVSA, the parent company of Citgo and several other subsidiaries. The United States announced new sanctions against PDVSA in January as part of an effort to pressure Maduro to resign.
Read More:
Could Venezuela Sanctions Bring New Opportunities for US Businesses?
Venezuelan Opposition Targeted by Country's Internet Censors
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInternal Whistleblowing Surged Globally in 2024, So Why Were US Numbers Flat?
6 minute readLawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Is It Time for Large UK Law Firms to Begin Taking Private Equity Investment?
- 2Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Launch Defensive Measure
- 3Class Action Litigator Tapped to Lead Shook, Hardy & Bacon's Houston Office
- 4Arizona Supreme Court Presses Pause on KPMG's Bid to Deliver Legal Services
- 5Bill Would Consolidate Antitrust Enforcement Under DOJ
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250