New Report Says Manufacturers Can Expect More Suits on Energy Projects, Climate Change, Privacy and Data Security
Manufacturers in 2019 are likely to see continued attacks on their energy infrastructure projects, more climate change litigation, and a steady stream of liability actions over data privacy and hacking incidents, according to a new report from the in-house lawyers at the National Association of Manufacturers.
March 18, 2019 at 07:17 PM
4 minute read
Manufacturers in 2019 are likely to see continued attacks on their energy infrastructure projects including pipelines, more climate change litigation, and a steady stream of liability actions over data privacy and hacking incidents. That's according to the first ever litigation report from the in-house lawyers at the National Association of Manufacturers.
The report also includes the group's litigation and amicus wins in 2018, along with a look at ongoing litigation and amicus projects. The report was published by NAM's legal arm, the Manufacturers' Center for Legal Action.
Linda Kelly, the group's senior vice president and general counsel, said the most significant litigation win last year was its 9-0 victory in National Association of Manufacturers v. U.S. Department of Defense in the U.S. Supreme Court over a jurisdictional issue that had delayed legal challenges to the Environmental Protection Agency's 2015 “Waters of the United States” Rule.
“We'd been involved in the case for a long time, and it was a very high-profile engagement for us,” Kelly said. “This is the first time a case carrying the NAM name has come before the court.”
She said resolving the jurisdictional issue “was a very time-saving and illuminating outcome for a wide variety of cases in a number of places.” The victory cleared the path for the group to move forward with its lawsuit seeking to invalidate the rule in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. A decision is expected in the next few months.
Kelly said other cases that loom significantly this year—and in which the center has filed or will file amicus briefs—include appeals in two climate change cases, where plaintiffs seek to apply “public nuisance” tort liability on manufacturers that are allegedly contributing to global warming.
The cases are important, she said, because the public nuisance theory could be expanded to any industry over any popular issue, such as lead paint, agricultural chemicals or even McDonald's hamburgers in obesity litigation.
“It's like a super tort,” Kelly said, “so broad that it could swallow up all other product liabilities claims. If that happens, it is open season on manufacturers.”
The other case Kelly finds especially consequential for manufacturers this year is the U.S. Supreme Court's review of a doctrine called “Auer deference.” The doctrine allows agencies to give extreme deference to a federal agency's interpretation of its own rules.
“So much of our litigation centers on whether or not a federal agency has the authority to do what it did,” Kelly explained. “To have the court actually provide some additional direction and potentially narrow the deference would be significant.”
The report also highlights the center's Manufacturers' Accountability Project and the Manufacturers' Compliance Institute. The accountability project was formed to help battle the climate change suits, and so far it has a perfect 3-0 record in court cases.
The Compliance Institute won the regional Association of Corporate Counsel's 2018 In-House Innovator Award. The institute provides free legal and regulatory compliance guidance to NAM members, through partnerships with six top-tier law firms.
The law firms include Sidley Austin for environmental issues; Littler Mendelson on labor and employment law; Wiley Rein on intellectual property; Shook, Hardy & Bacon on product safety; Squire Patton Boggs for international issues; and Crowell & Moring on California Proposition 65, a ballot initiative on toxic chemical use.
One participant in the free calls is Littler employment law attorney Michael Lotito. He said many of the calls come from members at smaller companies that may not even have an in-house counsel. “It's usually about fundamental compliance issues in labor law,” Lotito explained, although occasionally a case's facts may be rather complex.
Drawing more members than the individual calls, he said, are useful webinars that offer new developments on labor issues.
The report said last year the institute answered 64 member requests for compliance assistance, and hosted five webinars that served over 1,000 members.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
Kristin Coleman Out as GC of Albemarle Amid Leadership Reshuffle
FTC Bans Exec From Chevron Board—Exercising Authority It Doesn't Have, GOP Dissenters Say
5 minute readAiling Oslo EV Battery Maker Axes CLO, Seeks Replacement in Incentive-Rich US
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1FTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
- 2Ignore the Decline in US Rule of Law at Your Peril
- 3How Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
- 4Jury Awards $1.25M to Police Officer Who Claimed Sexual Harassment
- 5Lawyer as Whistleblower? Associate Sues Firm
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250