Report: Pharmaceutical and Financial Services Have Most Mature Use of E-Discovery Tech
The first report from Exterro on e-discovery maturity found that companies in the financial services and pharmaceutical industries are the most advanced when it comes to the use of e-discovery technology.
March 19, 2019 at 02:59 PM
3 minute read
The pharmaceutical and finance industries are the most mature when it comes to the use of e-discovery, according to a report from Exterro released on Monday.
Exterro partnered with EDRM at Duke Law to produce the report, which has responses from 218 different companies with at least 200 employees. All of the answers were anonymized so Exterro only knew the industry of the company and number of employees the respondents had in the company.
EDRM did not respond to request for comment on the report.
Jamal Stockton, a member of the board of directors at the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium, said one of the reasons pharmaceutical and financial companies have more mature uses of e-discovery technology is because of the amount of outside counsel spend those companies have.
“When you have a lot of outside counsel spend, in terms of transformation and innovation internally, you're going to go after that e-discovery spend because it's costing me millions of dollars a year and it's the easiest thing for us to get our arms around in terms of controlling the spend and reducing it,” Stockton said.
Stockton also explained at their core financial services and pharmaceutical companies are partly technology companies and more likely to experiment with legal technology.
“Being technology companies, they're putting on the innovation hat and asking how they can use technology to transform business,” Stockton said. “That's part of the DNA of financial service and pharmaceutical companies.”
Bill Piwonka, chief marketing officer at Exterro, also said regulation and a high number of lawsuits play a role in how e-discovery technology is used in those sectors. He added this is the first report Exterro has put out on e-discovery maturity.
“What we are finding is that more and more organizations are treating legal operations and e-discovery as business processes,” Piwonka said. “Over the last five years we've seen a trend toward the legal department saying, 'We can treat a lot of what we do as business processes.'”
He said companies are about as mature with their use of e-discovery technology as he expected they would be and are working to become more efficient with the technology.
“Every matter is different and the scope is different, but you're doing the same thing; identifying data and identifying custodians. The steps you take to do that can be thought of as a business process,” Piwonka said. “If you take the business process approach you can identify where you're spending the most time and money.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
- 1Arguing Class Actions: With Friends Like These...
- 2How Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
- 3Fried Frank Partner Leaves for Paul Hastings to Start Tech Transactions Practice
- 4Stradley Ronon Welcomes Insurance Team From Mintz
- 5Weil Adds Acting Director of SEC Enforcement, Continuing Government Hiring Streak
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250