EU Hits Google With Antitrust Fine of $1.69 Billion Over Ad Practices
The European Commission's antitrust regulators issued a third fine against Google Wednesday, this time over its ad practices. Google now faces more than $9 million in EU antitrust fines.
March 20, 2019 at 04:12 PM
4 minute read
Google has been hit with a third antitrust fine from European Union regulators over alleged antitrust violations related to ad sales, as calls to break up big tech grow.
European Commissioner for Competition Margrethe Vestager tweeted Wednesday that the EU fined Google 1.49 billion euros ($1.69 billion) for “illegal practices in search advertising brokering.” She claimed the Mountain View, California-based company misused its dominant position in search ads—holding more than 70 percent of the EU market from 2006 to 2016—by imposing “contractual restrictions on third-party sites.”
The fine stems from Google's “AdSense for Search” program, which brokered ad deals between website publishers offering in-site search functions and advertisers. According to the European Commission, Google contractually prohibited competitors' advertisements from appearing in third-party websites' search results starting in 2006.
“This is illegal under EU antitrust rules,” Vestager said in a press release. “The misconduct lasted over 10 years and denied other companies the possibility to compete on the merits and to innovate—and consumers the benefits of competition.”
The commission said Google began shifting to a “premium placement” model in 2009. It required publishers, such as news sites, to place Google's advertisements in the most profitable part of their website's search results, over competitors. The same year, Google also allegedly included clauses mandating publishers get the company's approval before changing rivals' advertisements, allowing it to “control how attractive, and therefore clicked on, competing search adverts could be.”
Google stopped the practices in July 2016 after the commission issued a statement of objections. But the latest fine, accounting for 1.29 percent of Google's 2018 global turnover, is meant to prevent the company from implementing similar practices.
“We've always agreed that healthy, thriving markets are in everyone's interest. We've already made a wide range of changes to our products to address the Commission's concerns,” said Kent Walker, Google's senior vice president for global affairs and legal department head, in a statement Wednesday. “Over the next few months, we'll be making further updates to give more visibility to rivals in Europe.”
Wednesday's fine is the third in a series of European Commission antitrust penalties against Google. In July, EU regulators fined Google a massive 4.34 billion euros ($5 billion), claiming Google-owned Android phones pushed users toward the company's search engine over competitors. Google was hit with a fine of 2.42 billion euros ($2.72 billion) from the commission in 2017 for promoting its own shopping comparison site over others on its search engine.
Google's EU antitrust fines now total more than $9 billion.
Walker said Google has “been listening carefully to the feedback we're getting” from the commission, in a blog post Tuesday. The company has changed its licensing mode for Google apps since the 2018 fine, making it easier for Android phone users to install competing browsers and search functions, he noted. Since 2017, Google has adapted its shopping feature to better promote competition.
Backlash over Google's size and practices more recently came stateside. Earlier this month, presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachusetts, called for a breakup of tech companies, including Google, promising to retroactively split mergers and acquisitions if elected.
Read More:
Massive $5B Fine Against Google Highlights Long-Term Shift in EU, US Antitrust Enforcement
Google to Appeal $5 Billion Antitrust Fine, Voices Fear for Android Open Source System
As Calls to Break Up Big Tech Grow, Spotify Files Antitrust Complaint Against Apple
Proposed Warren Regulation Plan Would Mean Extra Precautions for Tech Counsel
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
- 1Law Firm Fails to Get Punitive Damages From Ex-Client
- 2Over 700 Residents Near 2023 Derailment Sue Norfolk for More Damages
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Sanctions Attorney for 'Frivolously' Claiming All Nine Personal Injury Categories in Motor Vehicle Case
- 4Second Judge Blocks Trump Federal Funding Freeze
- 5Crypto Hacker’s $65 Million Scam Ends in Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250