Former Housing Authority General Counsel Gets $1.87M in Whistleblower Suit
A Houston jury sided Thursday with former housing authority general counsel Karen Miniex, who claimed the agency retaliated against her after she pursued allegations of employee voucher fraud.
March 22, 2019 at 03:20 PM
3 minute read
A jury awarded Houston Housing Authority's former general counsel $1.87 million late Thursday in a whistleblower suit against the agency.
The $1.87 million covers back pay, front pay and past and future mental anguish for Karen Miniex, who served as the agency's general counsel for four years, her representative, Berg & Androphy partner Zenobia Harris Bivens, told Corporate Counsel. In her suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Miniex claimed she was fired from the agency in December 2016 for raising concerns of employee voucher fraud.
“Nobody should be punished for doing the right thing and trying to stop fraud,” Bivens said. “One would hope the Houston Housing Authority would take this as a sign things need to change.”
The agency told Miniex she was terminated for unexcused absences, tardiness and decreased productivity.
Brian Begle, the managing partner of Houston's Olson & Olson, represented the agency.
“Houston Housing Authority counsel is working to determine our next step,” an agency spokesperson emailed in a statement. “At this time, we are considering all available legal options including an appeal, if necessary. We appreciate the time and consideration given by the court and jury during our case.”
According to Miniex's complaint, she received a tip that an agency employee was selling Section 8 vouchers for profit in March 2016. The following month, another tip claimed an employee was selling Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing vouchers, which are reserved for homeless veterans.
She instructed fraud investigator Ben Skalka to look into the claims. In June 2016, he informed her one employee had sold Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing vouchers to nonveterans for personal profit and that further investigation would likely unearth “additional, more pervasive acts of fraud.”
When Miniex informed the agency's chief executive officer and president Tory Gunsolley, her complaint alleges he dismissed her, saying, “Well, it is not like we don't have more vouchers than veterans anyway.”
Miniex claims Gunsolley continued to dismiss her reports of fraud and refused to take action against impacted department managers. As she continued to raise concerns, the CEO said she should “consider whether she wanted to be at HHA” because she was not being a “team player.”
After she raised the issue with the agency's board, Miniex said she faced increased retaliation from leaders, who concealed information from her and closely monitored her in-office hours. In December 2016, she was fired without first receiving a formal written warning or paid administrative leave “in direct contravention of HHA's time-honored, well-documented progressive disciplinary policy.”
Bivens said Thursday's verdict highlights the importance of taking general counsel recommendations and investigations seriously at all organizations.
“It's very important everybody from the top to the bottom understands that there are rules that have to be followed, and they all have to help each other follow the rules,” Bivens said. “I really hope that the city of Houston, the board of commissioners, and the board that has oversight of the housing authority will make some changes.”
Read Miniex's complaint in full here:
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
Ben & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute read'It's Not About Speed': Forging Strong Legal Department-Law Firm Relationships Starts With Humility, Trust
6 minute readNLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
Trending Stories
- 1Remembering Ted Olson
- 2Support Magistrates: Statutorily Significant
- 3Nelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
- 4Immunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
- 5Monday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250