OFAC Action Against Stanley Black & Decker Highlights Importance of Compliance Monitoring
Before acquiring a China-based power tool company, Stanley Black & Decker provided trade compliance training to employees and senior management at the Chinese company that agreed in writing to stop doing business with Iran. But its efforts were ultimately insufficient, according to the Treasury Department.
March 29, 2019 at 02:07 PM
4 minute read
Before acquiring a Chinese power tool company, Stanley Black & Decker Inc. took several steps to discourage the business from continuing to export its products to Iran, including training employees about the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and sanctions violations.
But Stanley Black & Decker's efforts were ultimately insufficient, according to the Treasury Department and its Office of Foreign Assets Control, which has reached a $1.8 million settlement with the New Britain, Connecticut-based tool company.
The Stanley Black & Decker case is similar to another recent settlement involving the Kollmorgen Corp. in Radford, Virginia, as both actions show OFAC “trying to drive home the message that deceptive practices involving a foreign subsidiary will not shield the U.S. parent company from potential liability for that subsidiary's actions,” said Michael Dobson, former senior sanctions policy adviser for the Office of Foreign Assets Control.
“The OFAC catchphrase these days is better compliance through enforcement,” added Dobson, who serves as of counsel at Morrison & Foerster in Washington, D.C.
OFAC found that Stanley Black & Decker gave trade compliance training to employees at China-based Jiangsu Guoqiang Tools Co. Ltd. ahead of its May 2013 acquisition of the company. Jiangsu's senior management also agreed in writing that they would stop doing business with Iran.
But Stanley Black & Decker failed to “implement procedures to monitor or audit [Jiangsu's] operations to ensure that its Iran-related sales did not recur post-acquisition,” according to OFAC.
Operating with an apparent lack of oversight from its new U.S.-based parent company, Jiangsu allegedly exported 23 shipments of power tools and spare parts with a total value of more than $3.2 million to Iran between June 29, 2013 and Dec. 30, 2014.
Jiangsu used four trading companies in the United Arab Emirates and two more in China as conduits for the sales to Iran in an attempt to hide its activities, according to the government. Jiangsu's employees also allegedly created bogus bills of lading that identified the wrong ports of discharges and delivery locations and told customers to avoid writing “Iran” on business documents.
Stanley Black & Decker eventually uncovered the misconduct through an internal investigation and self-disclosed the alleged violations, according to its settlement agreement with OFAC. The agreement notes that the company faced a maximum civil penalty of nearly $7 million.
In addition to paying a $1,869,144 settlement, Stanley Black & Decker also has agreed to conduct regular risk assessments and audits and provide ongoing sanctions compliance training to Jiangsu employees.
A spokeswoman for Stanley Black & Decker wrote in an email that the company is “committed to a culture of integrity and compliance.”
“In 2015, upon learning that employees at a recently acquired company had disregarded our training and violated our trade compliance policies and procedures, we took quick action to remediate and also submitted a voluntary self-disclosure to OFAC,” she added. “We have taken and will continue to take steps to ensure all employees are compliant with corporate policies and applicable laws.”
The Treasury Department stated the Stanley Black & Decker case “highlights the importance of U.S. companies to conduct sanctions-related due diligence both prior and subsequent to mergers and acquisitions, and to take appropriate steps to audit, monitor and verify newly acquired subsidiaries and affiliates for OFAC compliance.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElaine Darr Brings Transformation and Value to DHL's Business
PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
Datasite's Ethics and Compliance Team Drives Transformation
SEC Obtained Record $8.2 Billion in Financial Remedies for Fiscal Year 2024, Commission Says
Trending Stories
- 1Will Trump Be a Boost to Quinn Emanuel's Fortunes in China?
- 2Mayer Brown’s Hong Kong Split to Take Effect
- 3Simpson Thacher Launches in Luxembourg With Hires From A&O Shearman, Clifford Chance
- 4How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 5Big Firms May See 'Uncomfortable Flashbacks' as Cost Pressure Grows
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250