Report: Disconnection Between Security Officials and Employees on Data Breaches
In a new survey, 49 percent of information technology leaders say employees have accidentally put sensitive data at risk between one to 10 times in the past year while 61 percent believe employees put out this data maliciously.
April 01, 2019 at 05:38 PM
3 minute read
There is a disconnect between rank-and-file employees and chief security officers on who is to blame in the event of a data breach, according to a report published last week by Egress Software Technologies Ltd. and Opinion Matters.
The survey was commissioned by Egress and received responses from 4,000 U.S. and U.K. employees to determine the root causes of employee-driven data breaches. The organization also reached out 500 U.S.- and U.K.-based information technology leaders.
From the perspective of the information technology leaders, 49 percent of respondents indicated that employees have accidentally put sensitive data at risk between one to 10 times in the past year. Sixty-one percent of information technology officials that responded believe that employees have put out information maliciously.
“IT leaders are rightfully concerned by insider data breaches and believe that there is a likelihood of them occurring in the near future at their organization,” the report says. “Despite this recognition and understanding of the root causes, they still can't seem to prevent them from actually happening. The result is loss of brand equity; heavy compliance fines; and potentially lost revenue, lost customers and lost competitive advantages.”
According to the report, 38 percent of respondents believe that the greatest impact of a data breach caused by employee negligence.
Edward McAndrew, a cybersecurity partner at DLA Piper in Wilmington, Delaware, and Washington, D.C., said it is understandable that security executives at companies believe leaks come from employees over infrastructure.
“Employees are the most common attack vector into any organization by a malicious actor,” McAndrew said. “They [also] engage in non-malicious conduct on systems that result in potential data compromise or leakage.”
When it comes to the employee side, 94 percent of U.S. employees and 87 percent of U.K. employees responded that they have not intentionally broken company data-sharing policies.
“When employees do recognize that they may have caused a breach, they attribute it to a high-pressure work environment, rushing to get a job done, and poor training,” the report said.
CEO and co-founder of Egress, Tony Pepper, said in the report that security executives could be doing more to help employees prevent breaches.
“While IT leaders seem to expect employees to leak data—they're not providing the tools and training required to stop the data breach from happening,” Pepper said.
McAndrew said companies should focus on promoting a culture of cybersecurity. He said often employees are not seeing what the information security team is seeing when it comes to data events or breaches elsewhere.
“I don't think it's hard to do and I think it something that resonates with employees because these issues don't just apply to the employees sitting behind a desk or utilizing a smartphone on behalf of his or her employer,” McAndrew explained. “They apply to everybody at home as well. The best practices around identity and access controls apply to us as individuals at home.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250