Attorney Reflects on Martin Luther King Jr.'s Influence, Civil Rights Victories
Longtime civil rights attorney Fred Gray in a conversation in the Philadelphia offices of Duane Morris on the 51st anniversary of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.'s assassination remembered the slain civil rights leader as a humble man with a sense of humor.
April 05, 2019 at 07:15 PM
4 minute read
Longtime civil rights attorney Fred Gray remembered the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. as a humble man with a sense of humor who would listen to people and not monopolize a conversation.
“He would even listen to and tell some jokes that he couldn't tell at the pulpit,” Gray said Friday in the Philadelphia offices of Duane Morris in conversation with the firm's partner and chief diversity and inclusion officer, Joseph K. West.
Gray, 88, shared some of his landmark victories during the civil rights movement as Friday marked 51 years and one day since King was killed in Memphis, Tennessee.
“We have the privilege of having a conversation with someone who has been a hero of mine even before I knew I wanted to be a lawyer,” West said. “He is, I think, one of the most consequential lawyers in the history of jurisprudence.”
Gray said, for a young black man in the South, only two jobs were available in the 1950s: teacher or preacher. He said initially he wanted to be a preacher and a teacher. After spending years at a boarding school preparing to do both professions, he began to notice the hold that segregation had in Alabama because he took the public buses as many as eight times a day where he and others were mistreated.
“I made a commitment as a teenager that I would finish Alabama State, take the bar exam and destroy everything segregated I could find,” Gray said.
His first case, only months after being admitted to the bar, was that of Claudette Colvin, who was arrested in Montgomery, Alabama, for refusing to forfeit her seat for a white rider while on her way to school. Gray said he lost that case and Colvin was put on unsupervised probation, but he kept all of the court documents in order to be prepared for the next similar case.
The next case was when his friend Rosa Parks was arrested for refusing to give up her bus seat to a white rider on Dec. 1, 1955. He said Parks was arrested on a Thursday and the case was slated for the following Monday. While he prepared the case over the weekend, he said activists in the community prepared for the Montgomery bus boycott. A friend knew that the boycott needed a spokesperson, Gray explained, and King became that spokesperson. Gray said up until that time the reverend had not been active in the civil rights movement.
Gray said that, after the boycott, state authorities decided to charge King, who had left Alabama, for perjury in connection with filing a false tax return.
“We had a good team together and was able to get an all-white jury in the middle of the sit-in demonstrations in the spring of 1960 to end up finding that Dr. King was innocent of perjury at that time,” Gray said. “I think that was one of the most important cases because he was now protesting the Vietnam War. If it had come out that, while he was leading this new civil rights organization and at the same time he's cheating and wouldn't pay his taxes, it would have been devastating.”
West, who was previously the CEO of the Minority Corporate Counsel Association, also brought up that three schools Gray had once sued to desegregate would go on to honor the still-practicing attorney.
“I think that we always need to not close doors,” Gray said. “We don't have to do everything at one time, but you continue to be focused on what the goal is, and our goal still was to destroy segregation, but we had to wait a little while in doing it.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCorporate Counsel's 2024 Award Winners Performed Legal Wizardry, Gave a Hand Up to Others
'We’re Here to Empower People to Make Good Decisions': Why Compliance Chiefs Must Learn to Think Like a Businessperson
High-Flying Genetics Testing Firm GeneDx Hires Ex-Zoetis GC as Legal Chief
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome', DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250