Report Ranks Global Industries With the Highest Corruption Risks
The global construction industry is rife with compliance threats, especially in emerging markets where government corruption can taint infrastructure projects, according to a new report.
April 08, 2019 at 02:59 PM
4 minute read
Global companies operating in the construction industry face a minefield of corruption threats, according to a new report that ranks industries and countries based on the compliance risk challenges they pose to foreign investors.
Findings from the Risk Advisory Group, an international risk consultancy firm, in its 2019 Corruption Challenges Index track recent observations from former federal prosecutors, criminal defense attorneys and construction and government contracts lawyers.
They've warned that the U.S. Department of Justice is focusing more on the construction industry for enforcement actions under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
Atlanta-based Alston & Bird partner Paul Monnin, a former assistant U.S. attorney who served as deputy chief of the economic crimes section, said previously that the target-rich environment of the construction industry has become “the frontier right now on corruption and bribery and fraud enforcement.”
Goran Maksimovic, Risk Advisory's London-based director of corporate investigations and disputes, cited several factors underlying compliance risks in the construction industry, namely government corruption and money laundering. The former factor tends to be more prevalent in emerging markets, where foreign companies might be pressured to pay bribes for building permits, though it also can be a factor in more mature markets.
Maksimovic added, “We're increasingly encountering real estate construction companies being used as money laundering vehicles, particularly by high-profile business people.”
Other high-risk sectors include the energy industry and banking and finance, according to the report. Companies in those realms seeking to minimize corruption risks should “know your market and know your partners,” Maksimovic said.
Of course, companies will encounter more compliance problems in some outside jurisdictions than others. For instance, Turkmenistan, Libya, Somalia, Yemen, Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo have elevated corruption threats, according to the report.
While the report found that Africa has the highest average corruption challenge score in the world, there are bright spots amid the continent's apparent danger zones, including Namibia, Botswana and South Africa, where corruption risks are relatively low.
Companies with leaders “who know the value of what hides behind Africa's complexities and are willing to seek the intelligence required to forge the best path” will find “business possibilities” on the resource-rich continent, according to Hannah Gilkes, Risk Advisory's head of business intelligence in Africa.
On the opposite end of the spectrum, New Zealand was tops across the board for being the least challenging jurisdiction in terms of corruption risks and transparency. Australia, Singapore, Ireland and the United Kingdom also received nods for low corruption risks.
The findings are based, in part, on Risk Advisory's due diligence experts' assessments of the probability that a company will be exposed to corruption when seeking government contracts, licenses or permits in a certain jurisdiction. The report also considered the pervasiveness of local, small-scale official corruption. Those assessments were added to regime stability and transparency scores to determine overall corruption threat ratings.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFinancial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readGC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 22024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
- 3What We Heard From Litigation Leaders in 2024
- 4Akin and Simpson Create New Practice Groups With Integrated Teams
- 5Thursday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250