Facebook, Google Hit With Public Policy Questions on White Supremacy, Hate Online
Facebook and Google policy leaders discussed their efforts to combat white nationalism and rising hate speech concerns on their platforms in the wake of shootings in the U.S. and New Zealand. One representative asked tech to "do more" to prevent online hate.
April 09, 2019 at 04:11 PM
4 minute read
In a tense hearing Tuesday morning, representatives from Google and Facebook joined advocacy group members to discuss the impact of white nationalism's spread online, in the wake of violent hate crimes in the U.S. and New Zealand sparked, in part, by groups on social media.
The House Judiciary Committee hearing got off to a rough start—one that inadvertently highlighted the need for a discussion on online hate speech. Before a YouTube livestream of the hearing even began, accounts filled a live comment section with calls to “end Jewish supremacy,” spewing racist and anti-Semitic hate speech. After about a half hour, YouTube suspended the chat.
When the hearing did begin, representatives spent the much of the four-hour session in partisan arguments over which party was racist or anti-Semitic. Many Democrats questioned the selection of conservative commentator Candace Owens as a witness.
Nearly halfway through the hearing, Georgia Rep. Henry Johnson asked Facebook and Google the first question about social media's role in spreading a video of the shooting of 50 Muslims in New Zealand mosques last month. The shooter mentioned YouTube, which has been criticized for spreading flat-earth and other conspiracy theories, during his Facebook livestream of the attack.
“Many white nationalists have used misinformation propaganda to radicalize social media users. How is YouTube working to stop the spread of far-right conspiracies intent on skewing users perceptions of fact and fiction?” Johnson asked.
Alexandria Walden, counsel for free expression and human rights at Google, responded that YouTube does not allow content that promotes or incites violence or hatred. She added the platform does not delete “content on the border” that could be considered harmful, but said they “no longer include [those videos] in our recommendation algorithm … and comments are disabled.”
Yet an investigation published by Bloomberg last week found that YouTube executives purposefully allowed extremist views to spread throughout the platform because it drummed up engagement and, based on the platform's business model, more money, findings no representatives mentioned in Tuesday's hearing.
On Facebook's end, public policy director Neil Potts said the shooter's video was uploaded around 1.5 million times in various forms, with edits that made it difficult for the platform's automatic filter tools to detect and remove each copy.
Louisiana Rep. Cedric Richmond said Google, Facebook and other tech platforms should better coordinate content moderation of white nationalism hate speech and violent content such as the New Zealand shooter video, hinting regulation could come if tech companies don't shape up.
“Figure it out because you don't want us to figure it out for you,” Richmond said.
Potts also faced questions about Facebook's recent decision to classify white nationalist and white separatist content as banned hate speech that is indistinguishable from white supremacy. Fellow hearing witness Kristen Clarke, the president and executive director of the National Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, noted that despite the change, many white nationalist groups still appear on the platform.
According to Potts, the latest policy change is one Facebook has “been looking at for a long time” as it has promised to increase safety on the platform. He said Facebook now has around 30,000 safety and security staff.
For some representatives, Facebook's policy change is too little, too late. Texas Rep. Sylvia Garcia shared the story of a Houston-area resident targeted and attacked for being Mexican-American, and who later committed suicide. She shared her concern over rising hate crimes against Latinos and asked how platforms are being “more proactive in stopping some of this language” online.
Walden said Google and YouTube track trends on hate speech to identify dog whistles and slurs. Potts said Facebook uses automation and partnerships with academics and advocacy groups, as well as policy updates.
“Well, I hope you do more,” Garcia said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
- 1Meet Delaware's Incoming Lt. Gov.: 'It's a Natural Progression' From Litigation to Policy
- 2Class Action Settlements Totaled $40B+ Three Years in a Row: 'We’re in a New Era'
- 3Automaker Pleads Guilty and Agrees to $1.6 Billion in Payouts
- 4MLB's Texas Rangers Search For a New GC and a Broadcasting Deal
- 5Does the Treasury Hack Underscore a Big Problem for the Private Sector?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250