Trump Administration Raises Stakes for Foreign Companies Operating in Iran
With the U.S. poised to designate a branch of the Iranian military as a terrorist group, foreign companies that do business with Iran should be ramping up due diligence efforts or risk facing criminal prosecution.
April 09, 2019 at 03:58 PM
4 minute read
Foreign companies that do business with Iran should be preparing to bolster their due diligence efforts as the U.S. pushes forward with the unprecedented move of designating the country's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a Foreign Terrorist Organization.
After the designation takes effect April 15, providing support to the IRGC—a military unit that reportedly controls hundreds of companies in Iran's energy, transportation, telecommunications, construction and metals and mining sectors—will be treated as a crime under the authority of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996.
“This raises the question of whether a non-U.S. company or individual could be prosecuted for engaging in commercial transactions with an Iranian company controlled by the IRGC—that is, whether such activity would be considered 'material support' for the IRGC, even if the dealings are not directly with the IRGC itself,” said Kirkland & Ellis partner Anthony Rapa, an international trade and national security lawyer in Washington, D.C.
Rapa added that “due diligence is now more important than ever” in light of the specter of criminal prosecution, which could mean prison time and massive fines. But ramping up compliance efforts will likely be complicated by the fact that it's difficult to know which companies are under IRGC control.
“We're already fielding questions about it,” Rapa said. “They [clients] are at least at the stage of really wanting to know how the risk level has changed.”
The Trump administration could use this as an opportunity to provide more clarity on the IRGC's economic reach—or the administration “might also be perfectly happy for companies to throw up their hands and say, 'It's not worth it; we are now withdrawing from Iran,'” Rapa said.
President Donald Trump noted in a written statement that his administration's latest move against Iran marks “the first time that the United States has ever named a part of another government as a FTO. It underscores the fact that Iran's actions are fundamentally different from those of other governments.”
He added, “It makes crystal clear the risks of conducting business with, or providing support to, the IRGC. If you are doing business with the IRGC, you will be bankrolling terrorism.”
Iran has countered Trump's move by slapping a terrorist group designation on the U.S. Central Command, which oversees military operations in the Middle East along with Central and South Asia.
While the IRGC's designation as a terrorist group could add to the list of compliance headaches for foreign companies, it's unlikely to have any real impact on stateside businesses, as they've already been dealing with harsh Iran sanctions and embargoes.
Michael Gershberg, a partner at Fried Frank in Washington, D.C., and a member of the firm's international trade and investment practice, predicted that, even for foreign entities the “practical effect of this designation may be limited.” He suggested the move could prove to be more symbolic than substantive.
“I think most global companies were probably already hesitant to deal with the IRGC,” he said. “And given how embedded the IRGC is in the Iranian economy, I think the difficulty for foreign companies and U.S. government authorities or prosecutors is going to be identifying which entities are IRGC or are acting on behalf of the IRGC.”
Gershberg added, “At this point, until we see whether the government is going to ramp up enforcement, it's not clear that it's going to have a significant practical effect on most foreign companies.”
Read More:
New Iran Sanctions Have General Counsel Looking for Safe Path Forward
OFAC Action Against Stanley Black & Decker Highlights Importance of Compliance Monitoring
Converging Risks Defy Traditional Corporate Compliance Silos
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Ordered to Explain ‘How and When the Federal Securities Laws Apply to Digital Assets’
5 minute readApple GC’s Compensation Flat Again in 2024, but She Might Snag No. 1 Spot on Top-Paid List Anyway
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250