Report: In-House Counsel Plan on Switching Firms Over Technology Use
A report by professional services firm BDO USA indicated that in-house counsel are making it a priority to leverage technology and are considering changing outside counsel in the coming months.
April 11, 2019 at 04:20 PM
3 minute read
Thirty-six percent of legal departments are contemplating leaving their current firms for new outside counsel within the next 12 months, according to a report released earlier this week by professional services firm BDO USA.
The report was created based on the results of a survey to 100 senior in-house lawyers across industries in companies with annual revenues ranging from $100 million to more than $3 billion.
George Socha, managing director at BDO, said he suspects the reason in-house counsel have made the decision to leave their current firms is because of cost savings and the desire for better services.
“In-house counsel are under ever-increasing pressure to reduce their costs,” Socha said. “They are being forced to live and die by metrics in a way that hasn't been the case before.”
Socha further explained that the services they receive for those costs are also playing a factor. Twenty-nine percent of respondents indicated that a lack of innovation is the biggest complaint they have with their firms and 17 percent of respondents said their firms' pricing model is an issue.
The report also indicates that 71 percent of in-house counsel plan on leveraging technology in the next year to streamline legal operations.
“The increasing speed at which the business and legal environments are changing today makes continuous innovation even more an imperative,” said Stephanie Giammarco, BDO's partner and national leader in its technology and business transformation practice.
“They are much more concerned about results, about costs and factors like that than they are about the specific technology used by the other law firms,” Socha said.
Socha said while technology use plays an important role in firm selection, in-house counsel want to make sure that technology is used effectively and efficiently. He said firms are now expected to use technology that in-house counsel has in place. Socha explained that when legal departments have their own technology in place, they can easily view matters and have more control over the data.
“It gives you a much better ability to control the risks of having data go to different locations,” Socha said.
The report also indicated that 54 percent of all respondents said the biggest legal risks with respect to data is a breach.
“From the EU's recently enacted General Data Protection Regulation to a potential U.S. national data privacy law, to hundreds of other regulations at the state and local levels, corporate counsel will not only have to deal with the increasing quantity and complexity of compliance obligations, but also greater standards of accountability and transparency of them from external stakeholders,” Giammarco said.
Because of new regulations such as the GDPR, 59 percent of respondents indicated that they have updated their data privacy notices. Twenty-four percent of respondents said improving cybersecurity is a top priority over the next 12 months.
Socha said aside from regulators looming over companies who do not comply with data privacy laws, companies face higher insurance premiums, reputational risks and this “provides opportunity for someone to bring litigation under any number of causes of action.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers Are Adopting Gen AI Five Times Faster Than the Cloud
Mitigating Off-Channel Communications: A Guide for In-House Counsel and Compliance Professionals
12 minute readE-Discovery Services Company Repario Taps Former UnitedLex VP as New GC
From In-House at AstraZeneca to an E-Discovery Startup: New Fileread GC Discusses Major Career Move
Trending Stories
- 1Understanding the HEMS Standard in Trusts
- 2Mergers Are About People, Not Paperwork: Here’s Why
- 3Wachtell Partner Leaves to Chair Latham's Liability Management Practice
- 4Morris Nichols Partners to Be Involved With PLI Program
- 5How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Cultivating a Culture of Mutual Trust Is Essential,' Says Gina Piazza of Tarter Krinsky & Drogin
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250