Report: In-House Counsel Plan on Switching Firms Over Technology Use
A report by professional services firm BDO USA indicated that in-house counsel are making it a priority to leverage technology and are considering changing outside counsel in the coming months.
April 11, 2019 at 04:20 PM
3 minute read
Thirty-six percent of legal departments are contemplating leaving their current firms for new outside counsel within the next 12 months, according to a report released earlier this week by professional services firm BDO USA.
The report was created based on the results of a survey to 100 senior in-house lawyers across industries in companies with annual revenues ranging from $100 million to more than $3 billion.
George Socha, managing director at BDO, said he suspects the reason in-house counsel have made the decision to leave their current firms is because of cost savings and the desire for better services.
“In-house counsel are under ever-increasing pressure to reduce their costs,” Socha said. “They are being forced to live and die by metrics in a way that hasn't been the case before.”
Socha further explained that the services they receive for those costs are also playing a factor. Twenty-nine percent of respondents indicated that a lack of innovation is the biggest complaint they have with their firms and 17 percent of respondents said their firms' pricing model is an issue.
The report also indicates that 71 percent of in-house counsel plan on leveraging technology in the next year to streamline legal operations.
“The increasing speed at which the business and legal environments are changing today makes continuous innovation even more an imperative,” said Stephanie Giammarco, BDO's partner and national leader in its technology and business transformation practice.
“They are much more concerned about results, about costs and factors like that than they are about the specific technology used by the other law firms,” Socha said.
Socha said while technology use plays an important role in firm selection, in-house counsel want to make sure that technology is used effectively and efficiently. He said firms are now expected to use technology that in-house counsel has in place. Socha explained that when legal departments have their own technology in place, they can easily view matters and have more control over the data.
“It gives you a much better ability to control the risks of having data go to different locations,” Socha said.
The report also indicated that 54 percent of all respondents said the biggest legal risks with respect to data is a breach.
“From the EU's recently enacted General Data Protection Regulation to a potential U.S. national data privacy law, to hundreds of other regulations at the state and local levels, corporate counsel will not only have to deal with the increasing quantity and complexity of compliance obligations, but also greater standards of accountability and transparency of them from external stakeholders,” Giammarco said.
Because of new regulations such as the GDPR, 59 percent of respondents indicated that they have updated their data privacy notices. Twenty-four percent of respondents said improving cybersecurity is a top priority over the next 12 months.
Socha said aside from regulators looming over companies who do not comply with data privacy laws, companies face higher insurance premiums, reputational risks and this “provides opportunity for someone to bring litigation under any number of causes of action.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers Are Adopting Gen AI Five Times Faster Than the Cloud
Mitigating Off-Channel Communications: A Guide for In-House Counsel and Compliance Professionals
12 minute readE-Discovery Services Company Repario Taps Former UnitedLex VP as New GC
From In-House at AstraZeneca to an E-Discovery Startup: New Fileread GC Discusses Major Career Move
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250