Tennessee Bans Deceptive Lawyer Ads About Medicines, Medical Devices
Tennessee this week became the first state in the nation to enact a law to stop deceptive trial lawyer ads targeting prescription drugs and medical devices with some companies and their in-house counsel supporting the law.
April 12, 2019 at 04:47 PM
3 minute read
The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform is calling on other states to follow the lead of Tennessee, which this week became the first state in the nation to enact a law to stop deceptive trial lawyer ads targeting prescription drugs and medical devices.
The ads run mostly on television and the internet. Many use warning signs and graphic video of ambulances while flashing “Medical Alert” or “Recall Warning” on the screen. Some even use the logos of government agencies.
Harold Kim, chief operating office of the institute, said in a blog that the ads are part of an aggressive marketing plan by plaintiffs attorneys to lure consumers into filing or joining lawsuits against the companies that make the drugs or devices. Kim was traveling and unavailable for comment Friday.
In-house counsel Nathan Morris, the chamber's vice president for legislative affairs, told Corporate Counsel that the ads “scare people out of taking their medicines and the results can be tragic.”
Morris cited research by both the chamber and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that shows the ads lead to many consumers stopping their needed medications. People have been harmed by that, he said, and “in at least six cases, people who stopped their medications died.”
The Tennessee law, which takes effect in July, doesn't completely outlaw the ads, but it does seek to curb them by prohibiting any deception. It bans ads that display the logo of a government agency, use the word “recall” if a product hasn't been recalled, or fail to disclose they are paid advertisements for lawyers. An ad also must not present itself as a “medical alert,” “health alert,” “consumer alert,” “public service announcement,” or use other similar language, according to the law.
It also requires the ad to include the warning: “Do not stop taking a prescribed medication without first consulting with your doctor. Discontinuing a prescribed medication without your doctor's advice can result in injury or death.”
Unless the product was recalled, the advertiser also must disclose that the drug or medical device remains approved by the FDA. Any violation of the law will be considered a violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act.
Morris called the law “a win for consumers and for companies that produce much-needed medications and devices that save lives.”
He said the statute had the support of several groups, including physicians, patient advocates, and companies and their general counsel.
Morris said the Texas Senate has passed a similar bill and sent it to the Texas House, where a companion bill was introduced. “Other states should definitely follow Tennessee's lead,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
'Rocket Docket': EDVA Judge Controls Google's Fate in Ad Tech Monopoly Trial
4 minute readInfluencers Putting Companies on Hot Seat by Demanding 'Reverse' Morals Clauses
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1What Are Forbidden Sexual Relations With Clients?
- 2AEDI Takeaways: Demystifying Hype, Changing Caselaw & Harvey’s CEO Talks State of Industry
- 3New England Law | Boston Announces New Dean
- 4Nordic Capital Plans to Acquire IP Management Solutions Provider Anaqua
- 5Criminalization of Homelessness Is Not the Solution
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250