FDA Asks 12 Companies to Mitigate Sale of Tobacco to Underage Users
Walmart, Kroger and Shell are some of the companies that received a warning letter signed by the former FDA commissioner over the alleged sales of tobacco products to minors in their stores.
April 15, 2019 at 05:08 PM
3 minute read
The Food and Drug Administration issued letters to 12 companies earlier this month claiming their stores have sold tobacco products to minors and asking them to find ways to mitigate the sale of tobacco to underage consumers.
The letters, dated April 5, were sent to Walmart, Sunoco, Shell, Marathon Petroleum Corp., The Kroger Co., Family Dollar Stores Inc., Exxon Mobil Corp., CITGO Petroleum Corp., Chevron Corp., 7-Eleven Inc., BP PLC and Casey's General Stores Inc. Each letter was signed by former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb.
The letters were sent to the companies because they were found to have high rates of “violative inspections.” According to the letters, more than 15 percent of the companies' stores inspected have been found to sell tobacco to minors. Walmart was found to have a violation rate of 17 percent, while Citgo had a violation rate of 35 percent.
“This violative history is disturbing and cannot possibly come as a surprise to corporate leadership,” Gottlieb wrote in the letters.
Bryan Haynes, a partner at Troutman Sanders in Richmond, Virginia, said any company that received this kind of letter should take the warning seriously.
“I would advise any company that have some record of sales to minors that they respond to an inquiry like this,” Haynes said. “I think most companies want to make sure that tobacco products don't get into the hands of minors.”
He said it is “tough and easy” to implement the kind of policies that would satisfy the FDA.
“It's easy in the sense that you have to make sure you're identifying purchasers and reading their IDs correctly,” Haynes said. “It's difficult in the sense that you're dealing with human beings who are store clerks and who don't always follow all of the rules.”
Haynes said two reasonable solutions companies can put in place include making sure every person who buys tobacco products shows identification—no matter how old they look—or implement identification scanners.
“That way when you do scan the ID, you eliminate the possibility that someone could read the identification correctly,” Haynes said.
Haynes also said companies should start implementing their own secret shopper programs to see if employees are carding patrons rather than learning from the FDA.
In the letters, Gottlieb wrote that companies should not view paying associated fines and penalties as the “cost of doing business.” Gottlieb hoped the companies look at the “substantial public health impact” they can make by preventing the sale of tobacco products to minors.
Haynes, however, said some of the solutions the FDA has recommended in the past to curb the sale of tobacco products to minors go too far. Those recommendations include barring minors from stores or sections of stores where tobacco is sold or to not sell products deemed attractive to minors.
“I just can't imagine that anyone does that,” Haynes said. “It is one thing for tobacco specialty stores to have someone posted at the door to check IDs. But that would be completely unworkable for a place like Walgreens or a convenience store.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllExits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute readAfter Botched Landing of United Airlines Boeing 767, Unlikely Plaintiff Sues Carrier
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250