Twitter to Up Content Moderation as Calls for Regulation Grow
Twitter plans to strengthen its content moderation as international leaders threaten regulation. This month, Australia passed a law holding tech platforms accountable for violent posts on their site. Regulators in Canada, the U.S. and New Zealand have considered doing the same.
April 16, 2019 at 04:34 PM
3 minute read
Twitter revealed its plans to curb hate speech and violent threats on its platform Tuesday amid increasing international calls to regulate content moderation on social media.
In a blog post, the San Francisco-based company's vice president of service Donald Hicks and senior director of product management in health David Gasca said Twitter plans to update its community rules “in the next few weeks” and will begin “experimenting” with an option to hide tweet replies in June.
The company will also up its current content moderation technology to remove more abusive posts before they're reported. Twitter began removing nonreported posts in the past year, and, according to Tuesday's post, automated technology now proactively removes 38 percent of abusive content.
“People who don't feel safe on Twitter shouldn't be burdened to report abuse to us,” Hicks and Gasca said in the post. Twitter did not immediately provide additional comment.
Twitter's post comes as politicians at home and abroad re-examine social media platforms' liability for hateful and violent content posted on their sites, sparked in part by a shooter's viral Facebook livestream of the murder of 50 people at mosques in New Zealand last month. Social media sites struggled to contain the video's spread across platforms.
Shortly after the shooting, Australia passed a law threatening fines and jail time for social media companies and their executives if they do not “ensure the expeditious removal” of “abhorrent violent material” on their platform. Last week, New Zealand Commissioner John Edwards told Radio NZ that “regulating, as Australia has done just in the last week, would be a good interim way to get [platforms'] attention.”
And content moderation concerns aren't just being raised in Asia-Pacific. The Toronto Star and Buzzfeed reported last week that Canada is considering regulating tech platforms. Democratic Institutions Minister Karina Gould told Buzzfeed that “self-regulation is not yielding the results that societies are expecting these companies to deliver.”
The U.S. House Judiciary Committee held a hearing last week on the spread of white supremacy online, with representatives from Google and Facebook testifying on their companies' efforts to address hate speech online.
Louisiana Rep. Cedric Richmond hinted at the hearing that regulation could come if companies don't improve their content moderation strategies. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act currently protects platforms from being held liable for harmful content on their sites, in most instances.
“Figure it out because you don't want us to figure it out for you,” Richmond said.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh & McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
- 1Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
- 2Chief Assistant District Attorney and Litigator Shortlisted for Paulding County Judgeship
- 3'America's Next Top Model' Contestant Says Ye Assaulted Her
- 4LexisNexis Responds to Canadian Professor’s Criticism of Lexis+ AI
- 5'Everything Leaves a Digital Footprint': How to Navigate the Complexities of Internal Investigations
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250