Twitter to Up Content Moderation as Calls for Regulation Grow
Twitter plans to strengthen its content moderation as international leaders threaten regulation. This month, Australia passed a law holding tech platforms accountable for violent posts on their site. Regulators in Canada, the U.S. and New Zealand have considered doing the same.
April 16, 2019 at 04:34 PM
3 minute read
Twitter revealed its plans to curb hate speech and violent threats on its platform Tuesday amid increasing international calls to regulate content moderation on social media.
In a blog post, the San Francisco-based company's vice president of service Donald Hicks and senior director of product management in health David Gasca said Twitter plans to update its community rules “in the next few weeks” and will begin “experimenting” with an option to hide tweet replies in June.
The company will also up its current content moderation technology to remove more abusive posts before they're reported. Twitter began removing nonreported posts in the past year, and, according to Tuesday's post, automated technology now proactively removes 38 percent of abusive content.
“People who don't feel safe on Twitter shouldn't be burdened to report abuse to us,” Hicks and Gasca said in the post. Twitter did not immediately provide additional comment.
Twitter's post comes as politicians at home and abroad re-examine social media platforms' liability for hateful and violent content posted on their sites, sparked in part by a shooter's viral Facebook livestream of the murder of 50 people at mosques in New Zealand last month. Social media sites struggled to contain the video's spread across platforms.
Shortly after the shooting, Australia passed a law threatening fines and jail time for social media companies and their executives if they do not “ensure the expeditious removal” of “abhorrent violent material” on their platform. Last week, New Zealand Commissioner John Edwards told Radio NZ that “regulating, as Australia has done just in the last week, would be a good interim way to get [platforms'] attention.”
And content moderation concerns aren't just being raised in Asia-Pacific. The Toronto Star and Buzzfeed reported last week that Canada is considering regulating tech platforms. Democratic Institutions Minister Karina Gould told Buzzfeed that “self-regulation is not yielding the results that societies are expecting these companies to deliver.”
The U.S. House Judiciary Committee held a hearing last week on the spread of white supremacy online, with representatives from Google and Facebook testifying on their companies' efforts to address hate speech online.
Louisiana Rep. Cedric Richmond hinted at the hearing that regulation could come if companies don't improve their content moderation strategies. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act currently protects platforms from being held liable for harmful content on their sites, in most instances.
“Figure it out because you don't want us to figure it out for you,” Richmond said.
Read More:
Facebook, Google Hit With Public Policy Questions on White Supremacy, Hate Online
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
- 1Can a Law Firm Institutionalize Its Culture? Boies Schiller’s New Chairman Will Try
- 2Full 8th Circuit Hears First Amendment Challenge to School District’s ‘Equity Training’
- 3Exploring Generative AI’s Impact on Intellectual Property
- 4Training Lawyers in AI and Using AI to Boost Training
- 5EB-5 Rebounds After a Rocky Year: Challenges of 2024 Lay Groundwork for a Booming 2025
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250