Census Citizenship Question Could Hurt Tech's Public Policy Efforts
The 2020 census could ask U.S. residents about their citizenship status, a question critics say could dissuade immigrants from reporting. If residents are undercounted in Silicon Valley, local tech companies could see less federal representation and face recruitment issues.
April 19, 2019 at 05:42 PM
3 minute read
A controversial census question on citizenship status could impact California tech companies' public policy, representation and recruitment as its fate heads to the U.S. Supreme Court Tuesday.
Silicon Valley companies Lyft Inc. and Uber Technologies Inc. have already publicly opposed the Trump administration's proposed 2020 census question, “Is this person a citizen of the United States?” Critics say the question could dissuade noncitizens from completing the census, leading to inaccurate data with underreporting in immigrant communities.
The Mercury News reported in January 2018 that more than 70 percent of Silicon Valley's workforce is foreign-born. Fewer counted residents could mean fewer federal resources and representation for Silicon Valley; seats in the House of Representatives are reapportioned after the decennial census.
“It's an indirect effect that the undercounting can have on the political power of businesses in states [with high immigrant populations] such as California that are looking for federal initiatives, programs, processes that could be favorable to their businesses,” said Jorge Lopez, a shareholder in Littler Mendelson's global mobility and immigration group.
Fewer representatives could be bad news for companies such as Facebook, Twitter and Google, which currently face tough critics in Washington, D.C. Companies may need to rethink their public policy approach, Lopez said, if their area's representation in Congress is diminished.
Underrepresentation could also impact companies' ability to hire the best talent, noted Kelli Duehning, senior counsel in the San Francisco office of Berry Appleman & Leiden. Silicon Valley school districts and other public amenities could see funding cuts if the census undercounts their population.
“[Tech companies] are competing for the best and the brightest,” Duehning said. “Part of getting people to come work for them is not just, 'Hey, we're going to pay you this salary and you get all these benefits and great perks.' A lot of these people have families, so the schools have to be good. … If you have underreporting, the schools are not going to get the funding.”
Companies with non-U.S. citizen employees can double-check to ensure their documentation is up to date, accurate and valid, Duehning said, if there are immigration law concerns in-house. But she added “the majority of the companies have a good grasp of what their workforce looks like” when it comes to immigration, so the census might not raise any surprises.
Even if the citizenship question is included, the census “doesn't necessarily tabulate lawful status,” Lopez said, and U.S. Census Bureau is “prohibited from sharing [its findings] with law enforcement.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250