Twitter and PayPal's Chief Legal Officers Made More than $9M Each Last Year
Proxy season is here for many Silicon Valley companies, bringing with it chief legal officer compensation disclosures. Twitter's CLO made more than $11 million in total compensation and PayPal's CLO earned $9.5 million. Here's a breakdown of that compensation.
April 24, 2019 at 04:40 PM
3 minute read
It's proxy filing season for many of Silicon Valley's biggest companies, meaning the 2018 compensation information for some of tech's prominent chief legal officers has arrived.
Legal department leaders from Tesla Inc., Facebook Inc. and Netflix Inc. didn't make the named executive cut in their companies' recently filed proxies. But Twitter and PayPal Holdings Inc.'s chief legal officers did. Each made more than $9 million in total compensation last year.
Louise Pentland, the executive vice president of business affairs and chief legal officer of PayPal, earned a total compensation of $9,516,978 in 2018, according to the San Jose, California-based company's proxy filing. Much of that compensation is in stock options, $8,463,911.
“The tech industry is particularly noted for offering greater equity than most others and many executives are willing to trade off a lower salary for equity given the riches that others have attained in the sector,” said John Gilmore, co-founder and managing partner at consulting firm BarkerGilmore, in an email.
Pentland started last year with a salary of $713,942, nearly $100,000 more than her 2016 named base salary. She joined the company in 2015 as CLO. Her total cash compensation was $1,053,067, including salary plus $328,125 in nonequity incentives and $11,000 in “all other compensation.”
PayPal did not immediately respond to request for additional comment. But the fintech company did outline the performance factors determining Pentland's compensation, accounting for 25 percent of her target incentive amount.
Pentland led PayPal's legal, human resources, communications, government relations and social innovation functions, sparked diversity and inclusion efforts, and “organizational transformations,” according to the proxy filing. In terms of legal, she led “ongoing litigation strategy, mergers and acquisitions, and business matters.”
Twitter chief legal officer and secretary Vijaya Gadde made $11,799,901 in 2018 and, like Pentland, much of that came in the form of stock, according to the company's proxy filing. Gadde's compensation package included $11,298,824 in stock awards. Her total cash compensation included a $498,077 salary and $3,000 in “other compensation,” with no bonus.
In its proxy, Twitter stated its executives' salaries “have remained below competitive market levels due to our desire to maintain internal pay equity between executive officers and other senior-level individuals,” but that the company began moving toward market competitive salaries in 2014. Gilmore said CLO compensation is rising in all industries especially as they “take on more responsibility outside of legal.”
Gadde became Twitter's CLO in February 2018 after spending nearly five years as the San Francisco-based company's general counsel, one year as head of communications and two years as director of legal. Twitter did not immediately respond to request for comment.
Both Twitter and PayPal have chief legal officers, Gadde and Pentland, as well as general counsel. The companies did not disclose their general counsel's executive compensation information in their proxy filings.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGoogle Fails to Secure Long-Term Stay of Order Requiring It to Open App Store to Rivals
'Am I Spending Time in the Right Place?' SPX Technologies CLO Cherée Johnson on Living and Leading With Intent
9 minute read'It Was the Next Graduation': How an In-House Lawyer Became a Serial Entrepreneur
9 minute readRenee Meisel, GC of UnitedLex, on Understanding and Growing the Business
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250