Ford Latest Automaker to Face Probe Into Emissions Compliance
The Dearborn, Michigan-based company disclosed today that the U.S. Department of Justice has opened a criminal investigation into issues relating to Ford's analytical modeling and methods of testing a vehicle's resistance, though not devices such as the ones Volkswagen used to cheat on emissions tests.
April 26, 2019 at 03:05 PM
2 minute read
Ford Motor Co. disclosed today that the U.S. Department of Justice has opened a criminal investigation into its U.S. emissions certification process, the third such probe of an automaking giant in recent years.
The investigation focuses on issues relating to Ford's analytical modeling and methods of testing a vehicle's resistance, according to the company's latest 10-Q report to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Ford emphasized in the filing that the DOJ's probe does not involve so-called defeat devices such as the ones Volkswagen used to cheat on emissions tests in 11 million of its vehicles.
A DOJ representative did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment about the inquiry.
In January 2017, Volkswagen pleaded guilty to three criminal felony counts and agreed to pay $4.3 billion in criminal and civil penalties. The scandal also earned the German automaker's former top U.S. compliance officer a seven-year imprisonment term and $400,000 fine for his alleged role in the conspiracy.
And last January, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles paid $800 million to settle state and federal regulators' allegations that it violated clean air laws by installing and failing to disclose emissions software that allows excess pollution.
In Ford's case, it announced in February that, after employees raised concerns last September about fuel economy and emissions compliance, it brought in an outside firm to investigate the matter.
At the same time, the company also voluntarily disclosed the issue to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and California Air Resources Board, as well as “a number of other state and federal agencies,” according to Friday's SEC filing.
“We are fully cooperating with all government agencies,” it said. “Because this matter is still in the preliminary stages, we cannot predict the outcome, and we cannot provide assurance that it will not have a material adverse effect on us.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDigging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
5 minute readPorsche's Venture Capital Arm Adds General Counsel From Clifford Chance
'Stock Car Monopoly'?: Winston Lawsuit Alleges NASCAR Anticompetitive Scheme
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250